Archive for Family

Revolutionary Policy Suggestions For Education Problems In Pakistan

Education has great effects over psyches. Whatever sort of education will be the mind will be as such. If we look over the history whenever any nation want to defeat others nation it first occupy the education systems and curriculums of the occupying nations. Education develops the roots of any nation. Through education any nation prepares their generation according to their religious norms and values. We can easily state that rising social unrest in any nation is mainly due to improper education of generations. Within two decades we could prepare one generation for the country. Two decades are a small span to prepare weapon (generation) but impact of this prepared weapon is long and forever. I called generation as a weapon; generation is no doubt is a weapon for development of any country. If we prepare our generation according to our religious norms and values and make them faithful and patriotic then they are useful and best secured weapon. Otherwise we are preparing enemies of our country. If the generations do not put on a right track then they will diverge in the ways which they found in easy access. Any country has one religion therefore there should be only one form of education. A country having different ways and levels of educations mentions that the country have no defined religion and culture.

Pakistan is going through lot of problems like terrorism, poverty, insecurity, sectarianism, ethnic, provisional and regional bigotries and many others. All these problems are due to lack of awareness and tolerance which are developed due to illiteracy. If we observe around us countries with most secured lives and economies prefer education for the people first. However in Pakistan phenomena of education kept far behind at every level of policy making for development. Our historical political parties mostly blame stressed international affairs started just after independence for their poor policies; they claim the foreign tensions do not give them space to think thoroughly about these social matters. Now activities of various governments developed a long history for failure of implementing true policies for education to all masses on equality and quality basis.

In this article first I will narrate the whole history with the help of various books, articles, reports and research papers. Then current situation will be discussed shortly, in the end I will suggest few approaches and policies according to my knowledge and experience. This article will be helpful for future policy makers who kept a sincere heart for the prosperity of people of Pakistan along with cultural preservation.

Contents

Historical background
Current situation Research papers outcomes
New educational policy 2009 ( Qualities and flaws)

Revolutionary policy suggestions Approaches
Curriculum suggestions

Ending words

Historical background

Even before the independence, Pakistan adopted the same education system that poured by Britain rule to occupy the sub-continent culturally. After the independence Pakistan failed to recognize the impacts of British schooling system and could not modify the maktab system of mughlia era according to modernism to fulfill Islamic as well as global competitiveness needs. Britain educational system was introduced with the aim to alienate the Muslims who hate British hegemony. British educational system completely abolishes Islamic way of teaching. They replaced Persian and Arabic, the pride of Muslims, with English. The curriculum designed to serve colonial empire instead of intellectual growth of students. Maktab were replaced by institutions setup by colonial administrations. The goal of all these educational changes was to dismantle the culture of Muslims, which make them able to rule for over centuries in history.

People of Pakistan are well aware of these facts despite this they failed to adopt and make effective policies which could resume their culture besides develop their lifestyles. Nowadays experts calculate myriads reasons of terrorism, poverty, unemployment, failure of economy and democracy, and insecurity but few of them able to understand the impact of educated system with Britain soul. While studying about history of education system in Pakistan I go through a book by M Imtiaz Shahid “Advanced Contemporary Affairs, book 62″. In this book Manzoor Ahmed narrates very controversial views our history of educational flaws in Pakistan. In his article “The problematique of education in Pakistan” he says;

” unfortunately, unlike communism which is based on a well worked out philosophy of history and social theory, amenable to intellectual refutation or amendment ‘ Islamic ideology’ is pseudo concept, having no intellectual sound basis and , since it is divine is not amenable to argumentation. This paradigm suits well to the feudalists and religionists, both having in-built antagonism for education. The situation worsens because Muslims as a whole have been suffering from the delusion that they are the possessors of knowledge and that their knowledge is self sufficient. They suffer from the phobia that an exposure to new ideas would threaten their identity and would weaken their belief system. If we look back at our history which ha been very proudly presented as one of the best, we would be perplexed to note that Muslim intellectuals ( ulema) have constantly refused to study the ideas which emerged in the wake of modernism, but were eager to claim that whatever the modernist were saying has already been said before by the Muslims……… during the days of Indian independence movement the critical mass of intellect as well as the intellectual capacity of Muslims leaders was very mediocre, though we had very sincere and educated leaders like Mohd Ali Jauhar, Hasrat Mohani, Allama Mashriqi, Maulana Maududi etc. none of them were able to visua;izae the world they would be living within in the next 50 to 100 years or so” page 417

Manzur Ahmed is himself Pakistani and Muslim but I don’t know why he narrates the Islamic ideology with such disdainful way, and I can’t understand why editor of this book approved his article for his book. No doubt there were various drawbacks of our intellectual leaders but those flaws should not connect with Islamic ideology. These shows that how we loss our Islamic cultural heritage and its implications that our people become, slave mentally. Although vast majority of people have great hearts for their Islamic ideology but they failed to utilize it due to incognizant of diversified knowledge recited by Quran. Like Manzoor various secular scholars feel Islamic ideology as a hurdle towards implications of modernism. Implications of modernism failed in Pakistan due to wrong perceptions spread by upper and secular classes. Especially in Musharraf era modernism aspersed in patriotic and fundamentalists groups. Mr. Musharraf introduces modernism by the nomenclature “modern Islam” these shacked fundamentalists and arouse fidgetiness among the people. He separated the Islam in two categories modern Islam and old Islam. However Islam is only Islam neither modern nor old. However modernism is something else. By definition, ‘process of adopting systems, methods, ideas more modern and more suitable for use at the present’. These systems are mostly related to technology advancements, diversified subjects literature and more in-depth study of cultures, origins and all other school of thoughts with the help of research and theorizing. Islamic studies do not bound people to seek knowledge; instead it encourages evaluating nature. There are no prohibitions by Islam to develop and investigate new methods and systems for the prosperity and development of people. Islam does not restrict to seek advancing education and implementing advance economic and marketing systems. Actually on the eve of concept of ‘modern Islam’ various evil psyches find a place to fit their evil thoughts and, hence make the Muslim Pakistanis subordinated towards implementations of modernism.

In Pakistan now we have number of such psyches who do not accept Islamic ideologies to be capable of capturing modernism. This happened due to adaptation of educational system with British soul. This turned the psyches of Muslims away from their religious knowledge and pride. After six decades of independence till now our governments are passive towards developing effective educational system that could resume our cultural values and develop self esteem in Muslims to adopt modernism to meet their needs and compete in world economies. From the next paragraph, I am going to illustrate workings of various governments for the provision of education.

In 1947, after independence, the new country had 83 colleges, 3 Engineering colleges, 108 teacher training schools and 71 technical, industrial and agricultural institutions. M. Ikram Rabbani demystifies history of education after independence in his book “New Millennium Pakistan Affairs, 12th edition 2008″. According to him, from 1947 to 1955 education was responsibility of local bodies. During that era education policy was victim of political instability and chaos. The first educational conference in Pakistan was held in November, 1947 in which Quaide-eAzam outlined an educational philosophy which incorporated both the fundamentals of Islamic traditions and modern science and technology. Among others things he suggested curriculum revision, diversification of courses, compulsory religious instructions and development of administrative machinery. Despite this, from 1947 to 1958 no significant reforms were introduced. However, during Ayub era, efforts were made to transform the educational system in a planned and systematic manner. His reforms include National Commission on Education (1959), Commission on student’s problems and welfare (1964), National commission on manpower and education (1969), New educational policy (1979). In his era, educational planning was handed over to the educational establishment which was charged with plan implementation and the evaluation of progress. Annual development program introduced in his time brought long range developmental needs.

Bhotto’s regime gave its Educational Policy on March 15-1972. He nationalized the privately managed institutions which, was considered a landmark of Bhutto’s regime. Education was made free and compulsory at primary up to class X. The university grants commission was established to coordinate all universities. During Zia’s era Maktab schools were revived and national education policy was announced under which private sector encouraged to contribute towards provision of education. Islamization of education was remarkable achievements of his era. Later, Junejo launched a strategy which was aimed to promote mass education. He gave top priority to education in his 5 point program and assigned Rs. 27400 million for that purpose. He focused mass literacy and enrolment of school dropouts through Nai Roshni Scheme.

In 1992 New educational policy ( NEP 1992) designed , its main areas of interest were primary education, literacy, quality of public institutions, setting up national testing service, decentralization of authority in the administrative set up of education system and resource generation. Benezir Bhotto introduced, “social action program” in which great emphasis laid on education and literacy rate within given span of time. Silent features of National education policy 1998 were to evolve integrated system of education by streamline all educational sectors which include private as well as public institutes and Deeni Madaras. Eradicating illiteracy through formal and informal education by involving communities. Revising curriculum, imparting in-service teachers training and revising teachers training curriculum, enhancing technical education opportunities to reduce poverty, developing higher education, information technology sector and library and documentation besides encouraging private sector. In sum all the policies developed were most of similar natures. There may be any difference in documentation format but all have same goals with changing words. Moreover all the policies use future tense and future continues tense while documenting which shows haphazardness approach adopted by all government. Every new government criticizes previous educational policy and developed new one despite ensuring implementation they focus only to documenting confabs.

In Musharraf regime no new educational policy designed, he follows the already existed policy. He converted the University Commission Grant by Higher Education Commission. In his regime all sectors adopted objective type examination pattern. National Testing service was also activated at various levels. His government approved 4% of GDP to education in 2007. He introduced 18 new public universities. Although he focused education more then any government before, and carried out his policies immediately but he could not tackle with Deeni Madaras dilemmas successfully and his failure leads to currents situation of terrorism and hate.

Despite long historical works have done on Educational development, heretofore we are facing huge illiteracy, low quality sub standard and unequal education. Poor and improper educational philosophy and phenomena adopted in Pakistan is creating different stratums with different means and objectives. This alternatively raises argumentation among various stratums and, hence whole situation becomes regretful.

Current situation

Education system of Pakistan is facing strong criticism both from national and international researchers. Numbers of documents are available on search engines which highlight different perspectives of false education in Pakistan. International folks give a special importance to the educational system of Pakistan as they understand the role of education in building nations. Various researchers discuss Pakistan’s educational system extreme heatedly. While reading these documents I do not scold those international researchers, whereas I was guilty at the attitude of my own leaders towards a very sensitive issue. Despite failure of all previous national education policies current designed national education policy seemed to be failed also.

Research papers outcomes

Center for research and security studies (CRSS) published a research paper with heading “curriculum of hate”. In this research paper they condemn the curriculum of public schools scornfully. Although I do not agree with this paper because this show hate of non-Muslims with Muslims and this is another issue. Although there are various faults in the education system of Pakistan but it is false to state that curriculum of Pakistani schools increasing hate and bigotries. There are various other factors of rising hate in fundamentalists, secularists and nationalists. No doubt education plays a vital role in eliminating these factors but we could not blame only education system. Because we have various affirmative personalities raised from the same curriculums.

Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) of Pakistan also put forward a research paper “The Subtle Subversion, The state of curriculum and textbooks in Pakistan” in 2002 which highlights various drawbacks in curriculum of Pakistan. The research paper also condemns education system of Pakistan and put forward various measures to follow for the government. However, unfortunately despite discussing technology and knowledge backwardness of the Pakistani curriculum, SDPI condemn Islamic norms and values and patriotic themes of Pakistani curriculum. SDPI research paper condemns the curriculum of Pakistan because it violates the rights of minorities. The research papers narrates that Islamic studies made compulsory for non-Muslims also which is against Islam. The whole researched paper seemed to be in favor of religious minorities but SDPI do not highlight the statistics of minorities in Pakistan. There are 96.16% of population are Muslims, 1.69 are Christians, 1.40% are Hindu, 0.35% are Qadiani, 0.33% schedules casts and 0.06 are others. So, why education system should design for other 3.84% of non-Muslims? The report criticizes Pakistan’s curriculum as a minority right violation, whereas according to current educational policy 2009, English language suggested to be compulsory as a medium of instructions at secondary and higher levels violate Pakistan’s people’s rights. While deciding English as a medium of instruction they should think that what percentage of our people can speak and understand English. By introducing English as a medium of instruction number of students will fail to understand lecturing and ask questions.

While condemning Pakistan’s education system SDPI must consider the facts that Muslim celebrates Christmas days and other events in western countries in schools, holi in India with Hindus, then there should be no objections on Islamic soul in whole Pakistani curriculum. I am, agree with the fact that our text books are not typically according to new world needs but its not mean that we have to blame Islam so. Whereas, it is significant to teach students about Islam more thoroughly for their moral development. Our scholars failed to spread true picture of Islam in the text books and there is a need to develop the pattern of Islamic studies. Students should be taught in a way that they become able to analyses Quran themselves and implement its teachings in their lives accordingly. Due to low quality teachings of Quran most of our people depends on priests and they mostly give suggestions on the basis of their sec and therefore various argumentative misconceptions develop over Islamic teachings among people. Our priests explain Quran is a way that it creates bigotries and hate. Quran have such moderate teachings that non-Muslims increasingly entering the circle of Islam by studying it thoroughly. The overall impacts of SDPI report shows that they are against Islam and they want to separate Muslims from Islamic studies.

Harvard University, Pomona College and World Bank jointly passed a research paper “Madrassa Metric: The Statistics and Rhetoric of Religious enrolment in Pakistan”. This research paper negates the all previous statistics about madrassa enrolments in Pakistan. According to them only 1% of Pakistani children attend madrassa, which is much lower then previously reported statistics. The report denies various facts attributed to reason of admitting children by Pakistani people in madrassa. The report explains that not only poverty is not the reason of admitting children in madrassa but various ethical groups prefer madrassa for their Islamic nature of teachings. Beside this most of children attend madrassa because of absence of government schools there, and the only option of madrassa there. Moreover, the research also discussed that madrassa are not making inroads into mainstream society in Pakistan. They support their statement by discussing qualities of various private schools in village areas. Overall the research was of the view that madrassa teachings are not only and major reason of terrorism in Pakistan.

Haroon Jaml and Amir Jahan measures inequality in education of Pakistan through their research “The knowledge divide: Education inequality in Pakistan” in 2003. They successfully measure, the persistence of education inequality in Pakistan through District Education Index (DEI). Their results show low levels of educational status with high inequality. The most vulnerable groups are rural areas, Balochistan province and rural females.

New educational policy 2009 (Qualities and flaws)

New educational policy 2009 highlights all the drawbacks and dilemmas of education in Pakistan successfully but it do not define track of implementation. The decision of NEP2009 to introduce national education system need tremendous workout, but despite completion of one year no such measures put forward to aware the public about new system which would be certain for all. Education policy 2009 use excellent words to narrate a positive picture of policy but how will this happened and when will this started and what would be the initial steps these all are not defined well and nothing have done even after one year. A very long document of national education policy is seemed like a text paper showing importance of education and dilemmas of education and its effects on the nations. The document beautifully describes all these topics and use very limited words to new decisions and their implementation processes.

New educational policy 2009 criticized a lot by intellectual circles. Shahid Siddiqui criticize this policy in hi article “New Education Policy” in the book 63 of Advance Contemporary Affairs by M Imtiaz Shahid. His first criticism is that this policy announced before the expiry date of previous policy. Government defends this criticism by quoting that previous education policy could not give required results. Further the writer condemns this statement of government by stating that this education policy also does not meet desired results and there is a problem at implementation level. According to him introducing English as a compulsory subject is not new, this had been decided by Musharraf regime. Moreover he explains disconnection between policy declarations and budget allocations. His most important criticism is on announcement of allocating 7% of GDP to education by 2015. The writer could not trust this statement because of facts that, in 2006-07 the allocation was 2.5% of GDP and in 2007-08 this was reduced to 2.47%. In the year 2008-09 the amount further came down to 2.1% Of GDP. Similarly Mr. Shaukat Aziz, announced 4% GDP for education but fails to catch this figure. NEP 2009 announced to raise level of public-sector schools will be lifted to match the levels of good private schools and deadline for this is 2010. Three months of 2010 have been passed but no any measure has been observed. New session had been started and student bought the same books that I studied in my school time.They may have any magic to meet target suddenly. Mr. Shahid asked repeatedly that how this all will be done? NEP announced to adopt universal curriculum but do not mention any strategy. Another intellectual Ejaz Naveed from Imperil College London criticizes education policy in the same sound.

NEP 2009 decided to exclude PTC and CT for hiring quality teachers and announced that to become a teacher one should be BED with Bachelor degree. If we observe in our schools and colleges most of teachers are masters with BED and MED but despite this they could not teach well. And in various places a teacher with simple Bachelor degree without any BED in private schools teach very well. Hence government should compare hiring process and training processes of private and elite schools with their process of hiring teachers.

According to this policy curriculum from class one and onwards include English (as a subject), Urdu, one regional language, mathematics and integrated subjects. Provincial and area education department have choice to select medium of instruction up to class fifth. This means after fifth class medium should be English. Moreover, math and science should be in English and provinces have option to teach these subjects in Urdu or English up to level five after this they should adopt English language. By reading these points I come to a result that our policy makers think that only English can make them developed nation. They do not cater the student’s problems they just make a policy with Musharraf’s tail. If on regional and provincial level students study in Urdu from 1 to 5 then how they could understand all the concepts of science and math by entering class 6, where they immediately have to face all concepts in different language. By doing so we are willfully deteriorating the quality of education and students mentality. Teachers will also burdened because they have to pay extra time to tell them meanings of all science and math terminologies first and make the students to memories them and then they could able to teach new language. This would also confuse the students too much. In the primary age students are not responsible enough to study themselves at home, parents have to read their diary and stress them to do homework if we introduce whole system in English then those parents who cannot understand English will be vulnerable to stress their students to do homework. After fifth class only those students become responsible for homework and exam preparations that are good in studies but careless students need strong check and balance at home. If of English language system most of the primary or secondary pass parents will fail to understand the text and nature of student’s assignments and could not help their children hence students will become weaker in studies.

While introducing new education policy 2009 it seemed that they aimed to preserve English language. Our policy makers think that only English can bring change. China, Japan, Korea, France, Germany all these countries do not use English at academic levels. They use software translators and interpreters to communicate with world and to understand them. Native languages enable the person to understand matters more thoroughly. Despite various English medium schools most of our people could not understand and speak English well and they depend on views and discussions of others on researches, reports, speeches and other events. Other people always discuss events according to their knowledge and views all people could not understand the real shape of matters through their discussions. Therefore there is a need to enhance and spread knowledge in native language.

Nevertheless, after carried out education system in last six decades, creates big number of populations who could not understand and utilize science and math concepts in Urdu language. Therefore we have to develop such a policy which preserve our cultural language Urdu, help us to understand Quran by studying Arabic and help us to understand world by studying English. Pakistan enters such circumstances that it needs to learn all these languages to defend themselves worldwide and compete with world without compromising their own Pakistani and Islamic culture. From the new section of this article I put forward some suggestions to develop such an educational system.

Revolutionary policy suggestions

Approaches

In this section of article I am suggesting some approaches to follow. I designed these approaches on the foundations of my own experience, knowledge and observations. These approaches are not theoretical proof of any intellectual; they are just my ideas as common person of this society. These approaches could help to design sound approaches to follow later by any good government. Because for implementation of such approaches and suggestions there is a dire need of good governance by our politicians. These approaches with details are following:

1.   Crescendo Approach

Most of our policies seemed sudden jump to targets. For example, the decision of present government to equalize public sector schools and private schools within one year. This is not an easy task. We have to design steps to achieve this target. And those steps should be decided before announcement of such activity. Government policy does not seem to have gradual steps to achieve this target. At this stage we could not stress schools and colleges to have English as medium of instructions. First curriculum should be designed such that student could become able to speak and understand English well, otherwise its flapdoodle to announce English as a medium of instruction. Moreover schools in villages and in less developed cities should be upgraded by hiring excellent professional and by introducing advance facilities. Beside this all the subjects should begin in any one language from early classes. Government decision to give option provinces to teach math and science up to fifth class either in Urdu or English will create problem in developing concepts in higher classes. They should be in English from beginning.

2.   Brain Gain

Higher education commission should send position holder students of intermediate under their strict observations and conditions, to foreign developed countries for studies with full facilities and contracts to return after completion of studies. China adopts the same strategy to meet the global competitiveness.

3.   Utilizing elite schools scholars in teaching

Most of circles suggest abandoning elite schooling, (City, Becon, Roots etc). Despite abandoning, government should benefit from such schools. Scholars of these schools should be hired in remote areas with good grades to improve the systems of those schools along with preparing reports over various issues related to the area and the school problems. Such students should be bounded for one year in remote areas, after that they should be prized at national level for encouragement. Then they should left independent to continue the same task or to do any other job. We could term it as brain gain within country.

4.   Improving, hiring process of teachers

Teaching is not an as much easy profession as much it is considered in our country. Concepts developed by teachers from very early life used by one in whole life. A kid learns to take out percentage in level-5, if he got good teacher then he could learn to calculate percentage in his brain without calculator just in few seconds but if he could not got a good teacher then in the whole life career after level-5, he could not calculate percentage without calculator. Hence while hiring teachers there should be very critical process just like for selecting bankers. In our country most of teachers hired due to their relationships with local MNAs. And in most places teachers hired but they do not attend schools in remote places. In various villages teachers put any girl or boy on their place and enjoy their pay while sitting in home and give some percentage to their substitute teachers. Hiring process should include written test, interview and demonstration. Private schools mostly prefer only demonstration, because they hire teacher to teach not only to give them money for their degrees. Teaching is an art and everyone could not teach, it should be checked through demonstrations.

5.   Teacher training

Government should compare its training mode with training of elite schools teachers. Or government should train trainers from elite school’s trainers to improve whole training menu. A very simple girls and boys having qualifications from public sector schools becomes excellent teachers after training thorough elite school trainers, therefore government should use this existing resource to improve teachers standard.

6.   Parents training institute and adult literacy schools

In developed countries besides teacher’s training there is strong concentration on parents training. Children passed only 8 to 6 hours with teachers and remaining 16 hours with parents. Children learn from all sorts of activities and experiences in their life therefore there is a dire need to improve their all teachers (parents are real teachers). Parents should be trained that how should they behave with their children in different matters, how could they create tolerance and democratic attitude in their children. Connecticut Commission on Children develops PLTI (parents leadership training institute) in 1992 in USA to enable parents to become leading advocates of children. Government should go through the documents of PLTI and other such organizations and develop parents training institute. Due to illiteracy and rigid customs Pakistani parents are unable to guide their children and to develop tolerant minds. Most of the parents could not understand the tracks of their children and strictly push them towards own wills and which ultimately destroy, number of generations in our country. In childhood parents mostly use abusive language with children and mostly scold them without any fault. Parents do not care that how much their attitude effects children moral life. Moreover most of parents discuss family disputes with children, even mostly mothers share misbehave of in-laws with young children which deteriorates their whole life and they start disliking and disobeying parents. There are several such matters which are creating argumentative generations. Hence government should put special concentration on this matter.

Besides this as there is number of illiterate people in adult ages and hence we have illiterate parents. Therefore adult literacy schools should be established which include 5 years education. In these five years parents should made able to read and write at least Urdu. The timing of these schools should also be adjusted two times in a day, so that mothers and fathers could attend them one after another.

7.   Institutionalize parent’s teacher’s coordination

While teaching in elite schools for several years and then in orphan school for one year I observe in both environments that there is strong lack of teachers and parents coordination. Teachers mostly blame parents and parents always blame teachers. However, they should sit together to understand the real problems of students. Most of the parents thought that teacher do not like their child, and they willfully neglect, him and do not give him position. Such attitude of parents should be improved through training. In public sector schools, parent’s teacher’s coordination is about absent. Private schools have their proper calendar for parent’s teachers meeting but public sectors do not give any importance to this matter. Public schools should strictly bind to manage PTMs and submit reports on them.

8.   Make teachers job attractive

Teaching job is not attractive in Pakistan. Most of girls and boys do teaching just for time pass in their study gaps. If we ask from any young, what will you want to become in elder age? Very few will answer “Teacher”. Most of teenagers will answer as doctor, engineer, lawyer or banker. This show the teacher’s job has no respect and status in or country, that’s why we have lot of low standard and unqualified teachers. The hiring process, facilities and pay packages of teachers also shows that teacher job is a poor job and professional people do not prefer it. Government should make this job attractive by announcing number of income packages especially for those who hired in remote areas. Remote area teachers should be facilitated by resident and transport facility along with additional pay.

9.   Forming complaint desks

Teachers and students faced lot of problems within their schools and colleges. There should be e-complaint desk, where students and teachers could mail their problems. Also there should be facility for students and teachers who could not use Internet or do not have facility of Internet to post mails to head office of complaint desk. Complaint office should have only one office in Islamabad for secrecy and for immediate action without any hurdles. Address of complaint desk should be mentioned on text books of schools so that everyone understands it and parents could also contribute. Annual reports should also be submitted to complaint desks and members of complaint desks should also visit schools as required for strong check and balance. This institute should be made highly well organized and highly qualified and educated people should be hired there.

10. Formation of book banks

Book banks mostly exist within schools; they should be developing officially like other banks. Elite people and foreign donors along with government and NGOs should donate books, copies, stationary, uniform and bags in the bank for poor people in the country. Moreover there should be special branch for student’s fee, where fee for poor children could be submitted by rich people. The bank should be advertised in media and Internet and people should encourage in supporting poor people for education.

11. Make annual reports compulsory (M&E)

For better monitoring and evaluation all schools should bound to submit annual reports to complaint desks. Then compliant desk should compare reports with complaints and manipulate progress of each. Members from complaint desks should also visit suddenly to schools for strict check and balance. Annual reports should contain all sorts of statistics on students along with number of parents meeting in the school and views/complaints and problems of parents. These reports should be utilized to check improvement in whole system and to establish new policies to new issues.

12. Adopt integrated curriculum

In the NEP-2009 government announce for one universal curriculum in country which is also termed national curriculum. However government faced lot of problems in formation of such curriculum. I go through document “curriculum reforms in Pakistan, a glass full or half empty” by Baela Raza Jamil, while reading it, I observe that they want to follow SDPI document on textbooks of Pakistan that I have discussed earlier in research outcomes. Like many other policies present government follow Musharraf policy in another face towards education dilemma.

Adaptation of national curriculum is good decision but there is a need to be fair in this regard. Our government is not fair and wants to injure Islamization and ideology of Pakistan through new curriculum. Punjab text book board and NWFP board both opposing this policy and understand the reality. People of Pakistan should wake up in this regard and, save the generation of Pakistan. Despite highlighting technological and literal knowledge backwardness, government is concentrating on abolishing Islamic norms and values and hinders patriotism of Pakistani people.

Integrating curriculum should be developing by considering curriculum of elite schools and public sector schools as well as Madrassa’s curriculum (to integrate Islamic education in curriculum and reduce madrassa system). Besides this repetition of various concepts should be minimized for example, students have to study about seasons both in social studies and science. They have to study about Seerat-e-Nabi both in Urdu and Islamiyat. There are various such topics which repeated in same level in different subjects. This increases text burden on students without increasing knowledge. Therefore subjects should be integrated in one broad category, to minimize number of subjects by increasing quantity of knowledge delivery. Various subjects integration suggestions are given in following sub-section of this article.

Curriculum suggestions

Presently students have to study English A and English B, Urdu A and Urdu B, Islamiayat, Social studies, science and maths from 1 to 5 in public sector schools and in additions to all these Arabic and Computer from 6 to 8. Later students have to study physics, biology and chemistry on place of Science and Arabic excluded in 9 and 10.in intermediate classes i.e. 11 and 12, science students of metric have options to selects engineering, medical or computer sciences and those students who studied economics in metric mostly move to social sciences in intermediate, although various students with less marks in science group of metric also selects social sciences in intermediate or move towards totally Art group. In various schools there is also option for Art group in metric.  If we compare subject diversification with elite school we could easily understand very few options for education careers in public sector schools. Therefore such a curriculum should be designed which could give place for more subjects. In this regard I put forward few suggestions.

Curriculum suggestions from 1 to 8

1    Islamic Studies

In this subject Islamiate, Arabic and Nazra should be integrated. It is rubbish to teach Arabic from 6 to 8 and after it in BA/BSc. This is only increase of quantity of subjects, it does not lead to make students able to understand and speak Arabic. In early ages students have to study Noorani Qaida from Qari sahib in homes or in Mosques/Madrassa, despite this Noorani Qaida along with reading and understanding Quran should be made compulsory subject from 1 to 8 so that on one hand students learn to speak and understand Arabic and on other hand they complete Quran in schools along with understanding it. Islamic stories and morals should be taught stepwise as explained in Quran Majid. In this way each Muslim will be become able to understand Quran himself and could apply it in their lives. Islam should be taught only in this subject no other subject should have topics from this subject, so that minority could have option to study that subject. In schools from level 1 to 5 non-Muslim students should be engaged in other activities during the period of Islamic studies. And from 6 to 8 non-Muslim students should give an option to attend the periods or to not attend it.

2    Urdu

In most of schools Urdu literature (Urdu A) and Urdu language (Urdu B), taught separately. This increase text burdens on students, despite this in the end of every comprehensive topic there should be grammar exercises related to the topic. Comprehension should be related to Urdu Adab only; it should not from Quran Majid. Islam should teach only in one subject thoroughly. Although some of writers work on Islam in their literature, it should be taught accordingly without any exaggeration.

3    English

Similar to Urdu, English literature and language should also integrate in one book. And only English writers should be discussed in this subject. Most of English books contain stories about Pakistan and Islam, it should be deleted as English is a language and it should teach to learn only language. In this way SDPI objections could also tackled while preserving our religion through subject Islamic Studies.

4    General knowledge

From 1 to 5 social studies, science and economics should be integrated in one subject General Knowledge. In our public schools text books there is no information on economics and therefore students unable to understand current affairs despite highly intelligence. In science and social study students study different topic repeatedly in both subjects such as seasons, planets, lunar and solar eclipse, latitude altitude, formation of rocks and layers of soil, parts of body and many others. Therefore these two subjects should be integrated in one to avoid repetition and minimize text burden. From 6 to 8, science should be separated and economics and social studies should be integrated in one subject “social sciences”

5)   Mathematics

Mathematics should be made advance and treated as separate subject throughout.

6)   Computer

Computer should be started practically from 6 to 8. In most of schools there are books on computer which give very little information on computer. That information could be delivering in one chapter in the beginning of class 6, therefore there should be no computer before 6 classes, and it just destroys students. From 6 to 8, students should make able to use MS office, installing windows, dealing with software, Internet, search engines and e-education. This is not difficult as most of people learn it all within 3 months course. Therefore it is better to teach all this thoroughly from 6 to 8.

In this way from 1 to 5, total number of subjects will be 5 instead of 8 or 9. Similarly from 6 to 8, total number of subjects will be 7, instead of 9 or 10. It is important to reduce number of books and copies to lesson weight of heavy bags and burden of too much text and copy work. Some of suggestions in this regard are following.

A.  Reduce copy work and home work by introducing work books

In most of schools teachers use whole time in displaying answers for question on white board and students copy them on their note copies with full silence. Some of students have very slow writing and they could not complete all in one period, teachers mostly waste their time in checking about 200 to 300 copies daily with lot of mistakes and despite this mostly scold by admin and parents over little mistake. Therefore workbooks should be introduced in which answers of various questions given, and students only have to learn them, and teachers could have time to clear them questions and answers both. In most of the cases students do not know what the question is and what the answer, in exams they mostly give, answer of another question to the question asked. This happened because students could not understand English language, and teachers have, pressure to complete syllabus and therefore they could not clear meaning and concept of each question along with answers. Therefore workbooks should be installed which include, question answers, objective type activities i.e. fill in the blanks, MCQs, true false, matching columns etc ( available on Internet as worksheets which are easy to download and print, to develop workbooks one should get benefit of those websites). Workbooks with answers of question should be for 1 to 5, before this (from6 to 8) space for answers should be left empty and students should be guided verbally in class by teachers about answers and students have to fill themselves. After 8 class there should be no work books.

B.  Activity based learning

Activity based learning should be introduced; most of concepts could not cleared to students unless they do not experience it. On Internet search engines now there are variety of activities provided on each subject and concept. In the end of each topic in work books there should be explanations of activities and schools should be compelled to follow them and give statistics about them in annual reports and it should be then checked by complaint desks whether there is any reality in the reports or not?

C.  Painting activities

In most of the schools there is separate paper of drawing which is totally unfair. Drawing is an art and some students could have natural interest in it while others do not have. It is natural that some students could draw pictures finely but some could not even after lot of practice. Therefore painting should be installed only as an activity and students should not forcefully compel to draw dog or cat only. Coloring, painting, sketching and other techniques should be delivered to students but they should let independent to do any work in drawing activity periods.

D.  Extracurricular activities

Most of the public sector schools in remote areas neglect extracurricular activities like sports, annual day, fun fair, and various types of competitions. Schools should be bound to start such activities and give statistics over them in annual reports to complaints desk.

Curriculum suggestions for 9 and 10

In the end of 8 classes, after one month counseling about various subject options in 9 and 10, students should be kept independent to select any one of following four subjects which include further subjects and there should be no compulsory subject in this stage. Students who select any one of following four subjects would study only enlisted sub-subjects with detailed comprehension thoroughly.

1. Islamic Studies ( islamic law, islamic history, Arkane-Islam, Quran with full translation and commentary)

2. Literature( Urdu, English, Arabic, Arts)

3. Social Sciences ( Pakistan Studies,World Affairs,  Economics and Politics, Sociology)

4. Science ( Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Computer, Maths)

Students should give assignments which they have to search on Internet, each section should have there own website which should open to students to submit their subjectivity that develop in their minds during studying as articles, newsletters and manuscripts. Students should encourage developing their magazines which include their writings and views.

Curriculum suggestions for 11 and 12

In intermediate, after one month counseling, students have to give option to select any one from sub-subjects of their particular category. And that category should be divided further in few subjects for more comprehensive and advance education over the various topics. Here I want to discuss Pakistan studies, students have to study same Pakistan studies from 9 to 13 class, that is from metric to Bsc. It is totally flapdoodle and crummy to make such a subject compulsory for 6 years without any solid knowledge. Contents of Pak studies should be made more comprehensive in metric, so that after metric if students select this subject for their intermediate then they could study further diversification of this subject.

After intermediate

In the end of 12 years qualification, now students have to select any particular subject for four years Bachelor. After such a sharp education from 1 to 12, students could absorb advance concepts in active ages of their minds i.e. teenage, in this age student mind is most active and they could understand and learn more quickly. Therefore it is effective to utilize this age. In Pakistan most of students have, chance to study advance concepts in Mphil or PHD, in the age where he/she have also to marry and support their parents. In that age various other tensions attached with any single person, and they could not seek and absorb advance concepts. Pakistan is far behind in race of concepts in every subject therefore there is a need to improve the system in a way that it not only increase quantity but also improve quality.

While describing curriculum I suggest “counseling” in the end of each step of education. The aim of this counseling is to tell students that how a particular subject could help you in life. And it could make easy for students to select subject according to their will. Most of the parents compel children to select medical or engineering only, after wards students could not absorb them and waste their important years of life. Counseling could help them to select subject according to their taste.

Summer Camps/Vocational trainings

In schools there summer camps should be make certain in which students have to learn cooking, stitching, knitting, driving, singing , reading writing any regional language and etc. such courses should be make open to both girls and boys to reduce gender dependency in the society.

Diploma Education/ technical training

Technical education courses should be offered after 10 years qualification but diploma courses should be offered after 12 years of qualification. Instead of BED and MED, any diploma and post diploma course in education should be offer after 12 years qualification. To increase the number of quality teachers for primary and secondary school years in short span of time.

Ending words

In the end I want to tell that suggestion that I have display in this article may not be best but they are not as worse as much existing are. Although these suggestions seemed very difficult to achieve but infact they are not, there is a need of work hard only. Even I can’t say that it is much costly, formation of book bank could reduce various expenditures. Moreover it is very clear that if existing funds utilized fairly then there could be no shortfall of funds.

Online Degrees in Education

Education is very extensive playing field and provides you several diverse opportunities. Degree holders or teachers can concentrate on first, hub or secondary students. They can and production in administrative positions. Professionals can and focus in manipulative thinking material, adult education or they can and prevail on training as an administrative specialist such as principal or secondary principal.

Goals of Earning Online Degrees in Education

Teaching is considered as very painless up for grabs profession. But if you really like to grow to be a gain teacher you necessity contain multiple skill and expertise like faculty of treatment students, strong announcement skills and talent to influence, motivate and train. After earning slightly online degree in education from top accredited online university or college you will be able to train students to resolve the problems. If you start your career as elementary teacher you will teach all subjects of basic level. But on secondary level you will teach subjects of your area of specialty. Higher level online degrees in education enable you used for advanced education positions such as population colleges, vocational schools and universities.

Online Degrees in Education

Several online degrees from acquaintances to doctorate levels are accessible. Many top accredited online universities and top accredited online colleges offer online degrees in education. Following are the online degrees accessible.

O Associates Degree in Education
O Bachelors Degree in Education
O Masters Degree in Education
O Ph.D. Education Degree
O Degree in Early Childhood Education
O Master Degree in Education Administration

Online Associates in Education

Online Associates Degree in Education is ideal used for working distinct to tell somebody to a career move. It is very beneficial as it is very all ears and realistic exclusive of vast generation obligation of bachelor’s degree. You will focus on a wide-ranging education courses so as to include sciences, social sciences, arts and humanities. After earning acquaintances level degree your budding career paths incorporate thinking in a travel Start predetermine, Elementary educate Para authority and teacher assistant. Associates degree is considered as first level online degree in education.

Online Bachelors Degree in Education

Online Bachelors Degree in Education provides you option to grow to be certified K-6 Teacher. You will prevail on thorough expertise of K-6 elementary teacher certification, cutting edge enlightening studies, individual recourse development, corporate training and advanced education. You can limited slightly feature area of interest of your hobby. You will be able to help litter students to develop skills and acquiring expertise. After earning online bachelors you can production as elementary/high educate teacher, counselor, route developer, researcher and college professor.

Online Masters Degree in Education

Online Masters in education enables you to join better paying administrative jobs. Masters degree gives you the luck to grow to be certified authority in the manner of single. MAT or MIT and M.Ed. Are the for all master degrees accessible in education. You can maintain to production as teacher or prefer to production as principal or assistant principal. This degree provides opportunity to professionals to earn degree with job. You can earn this online degree in education to advance your career. Following are various master’s concentrations accessible

O Administration and supervision
O Adult education
O Distance learning
O Special education
O Curriculum and machinery

Online Ph.D. Education Degree

Online Ph.D. Degree is the highest level online degree in education. It is apt used for passionate authority wishes to secure advanced grade job. It is basically used for persons already had thinking experience. After earning online masters degree you can teach as professor by university. You will and able to conduct examination and apply come again? You learnt. You can focus in elementary and secondary education, special education, adult education and advanced education.

Online Degree in Early Childhood Education

Online degree in first childhood education is and an crucial online degree in education. After earning this degree you will be able to production with children beneath the classic educate age involving 3 and 5. Course production includes immature person psychology, parenting and first learning strategies.

Professional finds job in elementary or pre-schools. Early Childhood Education professionals effectively train litter children through important generation in which formative learning, skill building and social growth takes place. Children who secure proper training by this stage of life can effectively bargain their way through the academic and social rigors so as to each apprentice will contain to stand facing in a while in life. That’s why schools, families and government throw away substantial money on first childhood education.

Online Master in Education Administration

Online Master in Education Administration is a unique online degree in education. It is designed used for education professionals who contain earnest hobby in administration issues. Course production includes education finance, educate law, duties of principal, population relation and supervision of personnel. Degree needs internship experiences in educate administration by administrative and principal level. Plenty of jobs are accessible in enlightening administration. Educational administrators can production on variety of jobs ranging from period consideration administrator to college president or educate principal. Administrators contain gain announcement skills and able to plan budgets, supervise student’s progress, administer everyday operations, trust raise, manipulative policies and values and directive institute to sustain the state and resident values.

Philosophy of Education of Thinker Teacher Orhan Seyfi Ari on Educational Philosophy

 

Orhan Seyfi Ari’s deducible educational philosophy on philosophy of education rhymed thus philosophers’ philosophies, educators’, teachers’, educational philosophies’ failures to teach man his difference from wild animals he behaved as:-

I was an ape’ you say, -or ambhibian?.. 
And now?! Are not , now, ‘man’!?

 

Failings in educational philosophy were of educational philosophers, eastern and western thinkers of educational philosophy, teachers, in teaching values in educational philosophies.

 

Were affecting educational philosophies, educational philosophers, educators and education, teachers and teaching, philosophy and science, knowledge and wisdom, the biases in educational philosophy of those who thrived on ignorance and sought to unpopularize in their philosophies of education each other’s kind to the masses with many concerns or under pain of ridicule or other injury and unable not to believe or accept as told, by, e.g., supporting ‘the monkey trial’ or ‘discovering’ the Piltdown man, by abusing the trust and innocence of man in bigotry or ignorance ~ in teaching, educational philosophy, educational philosophers, educators, teachers too readily adopted viewpoint applications of not educators into philosophy of education, teaching -even in the education and teaching of young minds.

 

Ethical skepticism in philosophy by some philosophers was a concern of daily life in philosophy of education to educators and teachers in teaching -through philosophies of education, educators’ and teachers’ teaching affected society’s learned behavior ~ whether ontology, philosophy, philosophers could explain or not the transcendental, whether man lacked mental capacity for the transcendental as in some philosophers’ philosophies or not, some educational philosophies’ and educators’ suggestion, that ‘truth’ could be only scientifically known in philosophy, psychology’s increased acceptance of philosophy’s and philosophers’ ‘mind’, cosmology’s agreement with eastern and western philosophy and great philosophers on a ‘mysterious force’, made doubtful; science’s, ontology’s, philosophy’s, even great philosophers’ not fully understanding the transcendental did not justify educators’ and teachers’, in educational philosophy, deeming transcendental philosophy untruth in epistemology, education, school teaching; such attitude to transcendental philosophy, in any philosophy of education was disservice to mankind whose expectations from philosophies of education included aspirations global to transcendental philosophy based knowledge.

 

Philosophers philosophies through philosophies of education, educators’ and teachers’ teaching affected society’s learned behavior ~ whether ontology, philosophy, philosophers could explain or not the transcendental, whether man lacked mental capacity for the transcendental as in some philosophers’ philosophies or not, some educational philosophies’ and educators’ suggestion, that ‘truth’ could be only scientifically known in philosophy, psychology’s increased acceptance of philosophy’s and philosophers’ ‘mind’, cosmology’s agreement with eastern and western philosophy and great philosophers on a ‘mysterious force’, made doubtful; science’s, ontology’s, philosophy’s, even great philosophers’ not fully understanding the transcendental did not justify educators’ and teachers’, in educational philosophy, deeming transcendental philosophy untruth in epistemology, education, school teaching; such attitude to transcendental philosophy, in any philosophy of education was disservice to mankind whose expectations from philosophies of education included aspirations global to transcendental philosophy biased knowledge.

 

In educational philosophy also, good considered some eastern and western philosophies and philosophers man, bad other philosophies and philosophers; while differed philosophers’ knowledge and wisdom and philosophy and preferred educational philosophy, logic in philosophy on man’s behavior (irrespective of educators’ different policies and teachers’ teaching varied history) suggested that man was neither ‘good’ nor ‘bad’ but his developable original unique mind and intellect impressionable ~ society’s imperfections contributed (also through ethics of some philosophers and philosophy, biased philosophies of education, teaching of and by educators, teachers) to man’s suffering alone -this arose from influences ignorant of man’s morality not being only about society’s retribution, assuming man irrational and neglecting (also in educational philosophy) his being regulated also by intrinsic desires, their confusing strength with power and ignoring most philosophy and philosophers supported by history that man, his rationality always overcoming temporary hysteria representing wicked abuse and ignorance, and most powerful, whenever considered the nature or extent of retribution or neglect of intrinsic values intolerable, always (not necessarily through educators in educational philosophy and teachers of moral philosophy, by education and teaching) changed what he disliked.

Continues the suffering, and continues the wait
But tomorrows there are and the hope is great!

 

Educational philosophy, philosophers on ethics, morals, educators, teachers, often forgot that, ‘bad’ everywhere in minority, while man’s passion made it impossible always to ‘turn the other cheek’ and, e.g., his various laws extended mitigating circumstances to crimes of passion though cruel when by his biological constitution unchangeable by any philosophy of education he was in fright without flight, man’s morality included a sense of proud fairness and desire not to fail himself or loved ones by behaving badly -but for abuse or ignorance he preferred being thought well of.

 

‘Truth’ of philosophy, of philosophers, in practice (affecting every philosophy of education) -whether personal or (and especially) impersonal, whether experienced or presupposed, two kinds of existed: truth global, truth environmental; notwithstanding biases in philosophy and prejudices of philosophy of education, both were good, essential in teaching, education, in every educational philosophy. Truth global was truth understood through science, and truth accepted inductively or deductively by the logic of philosophers and philosophy ~ man everywhere, always, desiring to enjoy more, better, including the satisfaction of his intellectual curiosities on metaphysics, aspired to this. Truth environmental was that which, for reasons affected by various factors -e.g., resources or policies and philosophies of education adopted, as distinct from -or as variations of truth global, some of man’s aspirations and behavior had to be based on, for better and more enjoyment of, both, avoiding society’s retribution and extrinsic and intrinsic rewards, in his immediate environment -through philosophy and philosophers, educators and teachers in educational philosophy, this suffered in teaching, education (mostly of history, metaphysics) much bias. In adopted philosophy of education, philosophers on values, in education educators and teachers, had to balance these truths in educating educators, training teachers, teaching. 

 

Philosophers and philosophy of education and teaching, history of teaching and education, showed bias in epistemology, science, philosophy, incorrect knowledge in teaching and education of educators and teachers, through educators, teachers in formal teaching, about nature and man ~ when cultural philosophy of education and teaching ignored another’s cultural philosophy of education and teaching and attitude, and was not balanced environmental truth with global truth, that did not change, e.g., adultery in Austrian law [until 1987] and over 20 states of the USA being crime (severity of punishment [in statue or legal precedent], e.g., for polygamy in Utah and Idaho, for murder in the USA and Europe [also not affected by the former's thrice, e.g., the UK's once having varied it] being not the only or the fundamental measure), nor, e.g., the unacceptability of pre-marital sexual relationships in Turkey being no less in Cyprus and Greece, but gave rise by abuse or ignorance to extreme speculations also through educational philosophers, educators’ adopted educational philosophy in education, teachers’ teaching, causing leanings globally undesirable, injurious to, both, society and individual.

Society is the soil; individuals, the seeds to grow
Honest and sure is the deal: you reap what you sow

 

Philosophy, science, argued on religion, great philosophers debated God -education and teaching of and by educators, teachers, in educational philosophy, continued its ignorance or obstinacy ~ whether or not on spirituality with accepted unknowns an educational philosophy considered itself more knowledgeable in teaching and education on much eastern and western philosophy by many eastern and western philosophers about afterlife than one when in the womb about the world, was ‘God’ of religion not basically the ‘mysterious force’ of science, and were not the basic values of most philosophers and philosophy in keeping social order, e.g., as rights and wrongs based on ‘the ten commandments’, of all religious, secular, materialist societies?!

 

Despite some educational philosophers and philosophies of education, educators and teachers, wasn’t also in philosophy of education man’s imagination shameless and unknowns of philosophers and philosophy and science limiting reason -and (irrespective of influences through religion, philosophers, educational philosophy, science, educators and teachers in education and teaching) did not ‘conscience’ matter (which did in religions, philosophy, sociology, psychology) in philosophy of education?!

 

Concerns of philosophers, philosophy, with language had to be more, extended beyond symbolism which knowledge changed (just as, e.g., in dream symbolism black man was no longer a bad omen), caring not only about philosophical thought -in educational philosophy on language teaching as for social psychology and social philosophy it was for educational philosophy to prevent language being biasedlyor ignorantly perverted: it was educational philosophy’s disservice to future generations that, e.g., ‘gay’ they would hardly understand as meant in great literature ~ it was disservice of educational philosophy that artistes, intellectuals, academics, considered forceful replacing of words from languages of nations they hailed advancement in civilization and internationally funded literacy programs’ teaching basic ‘international language’; language, competently used, had been responsible for social reforms through, e.g., Dickens or Ibsen, such enjoyment through, e.g., Shakespeare or Fuzuli, such mystical and philosophical literature as, e.g., Goethe’s -the long term effect might compare to, e.g., the loss of great works of literature and philosophy by mobs’ burning of the library of Alexandria. Philosophers in education, educators in every educational philosophy, language teachers, it fell upon, in teaching, education, to ensure this appreciation.         

 

In philosophy philosophers, in teaching and education educators and teachers, did innocent disservice on the biases (e.g., educational philosophy more emphasizing WW2 enemies’ moral philosophy of education and philosophy killing five million than ally’s thirty million) or ignorance of the influences basing in philosophy and teaching the truth of two and two making four, also in educational philosophy, dependent on whether, e.g., “Avicenna’s” philosophy or [same philosopher] “Abu ibn Sina’s” philosophy ~ more than man’s experiences when young man’s innocence enabled cruelty, presenting others so different encouraging bad behavior. The need in educational philosophies for every philosophy of education to balance practical teaching and education with academic teaching and education enabling doers to be (or with them also there to be) thinkers was based also on man’s aspirations to, and cherishing, quiet enjoyment, often so upset -did not systems that failed man’s aspirations to cherish always perish?!

 

In educational philosophy also, it would not help knowledge in philosophy or in teaching and education of and by educators and teachers for philosophical thought to resign itself to silence on what none could deny but many could not explain; philosophy and philosophers, philosophical thought and philosophical logic, unaffected by ‘meta-philosophy’, existed because man’s curiosity compelled him what he could not know to seek to have an appreciation of, although one could not identically experience another’s, e.g., joy or pain in respect of which disagreement on, e.g., the extent of it, was possible and argument in view of unequal knowledge possibly impossible ~ in philosophy philosophers, in teaching and education educators, teachers, aspiring to prevent forcing on or distorting young minds were forgetting in philosophy of education that religions advocated a mind usable well or badly (as science the intellect and philosophy man’s will) in systems requiring faith in unknowns or reasons secret and abusable, e.g., by unequal measures comparing Dewey or Darwin and St. La Salle or monk Mendel; educational philosophy policies disregarded man’s reasons for requiring in educational philosophy [e.g., UK Education Act's educational philosophy] when teaching a theory other theories on the matter also to discuss to enable man to apply his own mind, and that appreciation advocated in every philosophy and essential to philosophy of education in every educational philosophy.

To believe, than to defend, is other…
To talk about is one thing, to do, another

 

Philosophy was not nonsense divorced from logic, nor affected ‘meta-philosophy’ philosophical logic application, inductive or deductive, and in philosophy of education, to the known of the known before and after and the unknown -also in the latter respect capable of useful sense in educational philosophy. Scientific research on philosophy, even though many a philosophy of education, e.g., only now had eventually agreed with millennia old philosophy and philosophers on man’s faculties in relation to teaching and education, was good ~ but that scorn through educators and teachers in teaching and education for some philosophies and philosophers was based on ignorance, e.g., of psychologists’ increasing acceptance of ‘mind’, of evolutionary theories having come to be accepted by science as not being as originally hypothesized, of the uncertainty principle of quantum physics as regards the mere act of observing affecting the observed, of personal development theories being adaptations from ancient philosophy and philosophers, was bad for teaching, education, teachers, reflected in educational philosophy badly as that or bias on educators on the purpose of education advocated by philosophy of education.

 

Educational philosophy, with growing interest in adult education, could benefit students and society by not disregarding man’s potential to always learn -his appearance of learning better when young was considerably due to concerns of adult life affecting as non-use did a car battery ~ and love, popular in many a philosophy of education, aided in education and teaching only if with understanding of both in applying educational philosophy policies.

 

Philosophers in philosophy, educators and teachers in school teaching and adult education, in every philosophy of education, owed care while teaching and educating not to couple biases affecting teaching and education and students’ knowledge and learning contrary to man’s aspirations ~ that began by exercising thought in education and teaching to think -society’s purpose of education in every educational philosophy.

Never the thinker expires
Who in others thinking inspires

 

Teaching of Teacher Ari on: Great Teachers

  

Challenges in Introducing Value Education at Higher Education in India

Challenges in Introducing Value Education at Higher Education in India

Dr.R.Murali

Head

Department of Philosophy

The Madura College(Autonomous)

Madurai-11

Murali_phil@hotamil.com

 

 

Value Education is the much debated and discussed subject in the plethora of education in India. Of course it is true that the main purpose of any education will go with Value orientation. More concentration on Value education has been given at the primary and secondary level of school education than in higher education in India. Values could be effectively imparted to the young minds rather than to the matured ones. It may be the important reason for this prime importance given at the school level. There are so many modules designed with the help of agencies like NCERT and others for effectively imparting the value education to the school students. In this context, many innovative educational practices are being identified by the experts. Good number of experiments and studies are being conducted in the recent days on the effectiveness of teaching value education at school level. Some schools have very innovative and radical course designs to impart the values.

Effective teaching practices in imparting value education ranges from story telling, exhibitions, skits, one act play and group discussions to various other formats. New methods have been evolved by educationists to create an effective learning sphere. The usage of electronic gadgets also gains importance in the teaching-learning practices of value education. But at the higher education level, due to various reasons, the importance given to value education is not as much as it is given at the school level. The curriculum and the teaching methods also could be subjected to scrutiny. It is true that colleges are meant for a kind of specialization in some field of education. But in the Indian social context, the youth require direction and counseling at this stage. They have been exposed to various challenges at this stage which demands the intervention of educationists for his/her betterment. His/her character building also strengthens at this juncture. Students’ perception on various life factors and events are getting shaped at this stage. On the whole they evolve their own philosophy of life. Their sensitivity and knowledge are getting direction at this stage. Hence, an effective value orientation becomes inevitable to the students of colleges. Keeping this requirement in mind, States like Tamilnadu introduced a compulsory paper/course on value education to undergraduate students of all colleges in the State under the choice based credit system.  Though this kind of effort is made with the good intention of imparting values to the youth, many limitations in bringing out the expected outcome could be identified.

The problem mainly begins with the definition of values. Defining the term ‘value’ poses a challenge to all scholars. The term value is loaded with varieties of meaning. Each meaning reflects its own philosophical position. Generally the term value is spontaneously associated with religious values. It is believed by many Indians that values are nothing but the religious and spiritual guiding principles of life. Hence, it is supposed  that the path is already been laid for the life journey. But in the context of modernity and modernism there rises a fundamental question of whether value education is required at all in a modern state.  There are those who argue that modern life is based on science and technology, and both are value neutral. They view that the values are bugbear held out by people living in the past, glued to outdated religious principles that have no relevance to the 21st century. At this point, there is also another group of modernist who propagate the necessity of value education at learning centres in order to safe guard the democratic state and its values. The values they wish to cultivate are modern secular values such as honesty, respect to other, equality, collectivity, democracy, respecting the human rights, sharing equal space in the public sphere and so on. These values are considered as the products of enlightenment period. Hence, four positions could be arrived at on the basis of the above understanding. The are:

There are religious values which are very much essential for every one and must be included in the curriculum.
The religious values should not find place in the educational system. They may operate at the private sphere.
There are non-religious secular values and they must find space in the education.
There is no need for teaching value education in the academics because they cannot be cultivated through formal learning and such value cultivation will make the individual biased.

 

In consequence to these positions, following questions arouse.

Whether value education should find place in the educational system?
If it is required, then what sort of values should be given preference in the curriculum?
What is the importance to be given to the religious values which are primarily developed on the basis of scriptures?
Can modern values alone are sufficient enough or is there any possibility of blending the values of modernity with religious values?
If religious values are to be given importance in the curriculum, which religion will find prime place? If there are contradictory propagation on a single virtue by two religions, then how are they to be handled?
Similarly religions differ on the practices also. Right from eating patterns, dress mode, marriage systems, war tactics, killing, punishments to various other aspects, religions differ on their outlook. In this situation, what sort of perceptions need to be taught?

Besides these questions, another billion dollar question would be raised on the methodology of effectively imparting those values. Then again as it is mentioned earlier, the school education can very well include this education easily because the system itself is advantageous for it to accommodate. But at the college level, the system finds it very difficult to work out.  So this study could analyse the theoretical problems relating to the identification of values to be included in the curriculum at the one side and the problem of effective designing of the curriculum and imparting those values on the other side.

 

II

The necessity for imparting values to the students of all levels has been felt by everyone. The world today is facing unprecedented socio-political and economic challenges. Problems of life are becoming increasingly intense and complex. Traditional values are decentered. ‘An environment of strife pervades all countries and broken homes have become common. An insatiable hunger for money and power, leads most of people to tension and absence  of peace of mind and all kinds of physical and mental ailments have become common place” 1. In the present day context of frequent and often violent social upheavals, we have to look at the problem of restlessness of the youth, their frustration born out of futility of their search for meaning of life and the purpose for which they are living, often leading to evil and wickedness. This calls for a new approach to, and a new vision of education. It is obviously felt that the present educational system promotes rat race and keep the student community in a sense of insecurity. Educational institutions have become the pressure cookers building pressures in the minds of youth. Also a loft sided educational pattern which insists on instrumental and technical rationality for the successful life in terms of gaining money and power has invaded the educational system of India. The person who is deemed to be unfit for this survival race becomes disqualified and ineligible to live in this market economy based life.    The spate of industrialization and economic growth in developed nations has brought about a perceptible change in this scenario. And developing countries including India are feeling the ripple effects of this development. Values earlier considered essential by all societies have been eroded and have given way to unethical practices around the globe. Where honesty and integrity were loved and appreciated, greed, corruption and red tapism have come in, bringing in their wake, unethical responses which have pervaded all walks of life and are thwarting efforts of a few enlightened individuals to promote value based society.2 Hence, implementation of well structured education is the only solution available with all states. With growing divisive forces, narrow parochialism, separatist tendencies on the one hand and considerable fall in moral, social, ethical and national values both in personal and public life on the other, the need for promoting effective programmes of value orientation in education has assumed great urgency. Development of human values through education is now routinely seen as a task of national importance. Value education though supposes to be the part and parcel of the regular education, due to the market influences, it could not be so. Hence, it has become an inevitable need to include an exclusive curriculum for value education at all levels.

Now the next question would be about the nature of value education. What sort of values should be given preference in the curriculum is the prime problem in the introduction of value education. This problem surfaces because we can find varieties of values prescribed on the basis of various scriptures and theories. Sometimes they are contradictory to each other. This issue has been thoroughly discussed earlier. But the solution to the problem of the nature of value education is primarily dependent on the social conditions that prevail in the state. There need not be an imported value educational pattern to be prescribed in India. The burning social issues would demand the required value education.  Though India is considered to be the land of divinity and wisdom, the modern value system throws challenges to the ancient value pattern. Right from the Gurkula pattern to the varna ashrama values, all values are under scrutiny by modern rationality. Hence, the relevance of the golden values prescribed by the then society is questionable in the present situation. On the other hand, the so called modern values which have been listed earlier also subjected to criticism by philosophers like post modernists. They question the very nature of the rationality of the enlightenment period. Because critics of modernity strongly declare that the modern rationality is the reason for the deterioration of human concern in the world and they paved the way for inhuman killing and escalation of values. The reason of the modernism is considered as the root of power politics which leads to inhuman behaviour of the power system, according to them. Hence the modern values like democracy, civil rights, environmental ethics, professional ethics, discipline and all such values are found useless in bringing harmony in the society. The values like discipline, tolerance, peace bears the negative connotation in this context. Hence, what sort of modern values are to be included in the curriculum is a challenge thrown towards the educationists. At one side the fanatic  and fundamentalist features of religious values and on the other side the modern values based on the market economy and other factors are to be excluded and a well balanced curriculum with genuine worthy values suitable to the society has to be identified and included in the educational system. In this context, it becomes obvious that there cannot be any universal pattern of values to be prescribed in the system.   When a suitable blend of religious and modern values is to be done, the designing of such course demands an unbiased, scrupulous, intelligent approach on the part of the academician who designs such course. Thus the spiritual values of sensitizing the youth for happy world and rational values for a just world are very much required. Religious values can be taken but not with the label of any particular religion, democratic values are to be included but not with its dogmatic inhuman approach. Thus there need a perfect blend of both. This is the real challenge thrown to the Indian academicians.

After the identification of these values, they need to be inculcated not to be informed to the students. Mostly listing the values is done very easily, but imparting them effectively requires genuine spirit and innovative educational practices. In the Vedic period, the gurukula system prevailed in which the student has to thoroughly undergo a pattern life with the guru shishya hierarchy. Whatever the guru declares are the values of life. But in the modern context, which is supposed to be the democratic sphere, a sense of equality and freedom has to prevail the learning situation. Also the values identified cannot be preached on the basis of the religious faiths. So the teacher has to find effective working module to internalize the values in the minds of the youth. The teachers’ understanding about the values prescribed and his/her commitment in imparting them also play a crucial role here. How to sensitize the teacher before carrying the values to the students is also a challenge to the educationists. The value education class room, if it is dealt with full seriousness and sincerity would be very interesting and challenging sphere for students and teachers. At times they need to sail at the same level with the students. The hierarchy may get disappeared. Value education demands a total responsibility from the teachers. They become more accountable. On the other side, a teacher who is committed to a set of values would always like to preach and impose them on the young minds. That extreme should also to be avoided with a balance of mind. Value education cannot be done by just delivering lectures and screening films. It requires a strong interaction between the students and the society.  A lot could be experimented at this sphere. For which the supreme value ‘integrity’ is expected from the educator.

It is observed that many modules of teaching values have been designed and tested. Some are seemed to be very effective. In Tamilnadu, especially in aided colleges, with all good intention the government has introduced the value education as a compulsory scheme at the undergraduate level. But each university has its own syllabus for the same. The scrutiny of those syllabi also reveals a lot of variations in conceiving the value education. In some universities, some religion based institutions are given the responsibility of designing and even carrying out the course. Similarly the teachers who have not been exposed to any such type of training in value education are given the responsibility of teaching values. The introduction of value education for all under graduate courses is done at the cost of a core paper of that course. The teachers who have been handling their hardcore subject papers had to meet the shortage of workload due to this programme and to solve this problem, they have been entrusted with the job of teaching value education paper. This is done with the aim of avoiding the workload problem of existing teachers. The most valuable and sensitive part of education has been made like a mechanical dogmatic part. At this juncture, the fate of value education at the college level could be imagined. How to solve this issue is again a challenge to the educationists of Tamilnadu. The same fate could be observed in many other states of India. Hence, two important problems surfaces here, one at the syllabus level and the other at the teaching level. As it is discussed earlier the syllabus could be designed by way of paying attention to all aspects but imparting the same requires not only innovative teaching methods, but also innovative training method of the educators. It is as good as training the driver to drive the car; the teacher needs to be trained in imparting the values. The technical education employs teachers with sound knowledge in the subject, similarly it is essential to have teachers with sound mind and creative teaching skill to teach value education. Value education is definitely not to be dealt with compartmentalization but it should be taken as a part of the whole educational system. As Nietzsche puts it, the society requires masters to create and impart values, not the slaves who accept all the values imposed on them without any critical understanding.

If education fails to impart necessary values to its citizens, it will definitely have a telling effect on the society. All efforts to bring just and peace in the world will become futile if proper value education is not imparted.

Notes:

Kireet Joshi, Philosophy of  Value Oriented Education Theory and Practice, ICPR

Publications, New Delhi,p.217.

2.   Ibid., p.218.

 

 

 

Hungarian Higher Education: the transition towards creating prosperity

Hungarian Higher Education: the transition towards creating prosperity

 

Abstract

The central issue of this article is that of the impediments to creating prosperity within the context of Higher Education during the transition period in Hungary from a budget-commanded regime to market-oriented operations. Fairbanks (2000: 290) refers to prosperity not only as the means through which people can live a good life but also as ‘the enabling environment that improves productivity’ and considers the purchasing power of a country per person’. It is seen as important as it affects living standards (e.g. malnutrition and poverty) and productivity levels. Thus dealing with the issue of prosperity also means dealing with poverty.

 

Fairbanks (2000) declared that each nation has a set of beliefs or mental model for creating prosperity which can change and suggests a 10 stage process, which is as follows: Decode the current strategy for Prosperity; Create a sense of urgency; Understand the range of strategic choices and inform them with analyses; Create a compelling vision; Create new networks of relationships; Communicate the vision; Build productive coalitions; Develop and Communicate short-term wins; Institutionalize the changes; and Evaluate and affirm the changes.

 

It is concluded that prosperity, despite being acknowledged as a good thing, is hard to achieve and a choice that leaders have to make when bearing in mind what exactly the consequences would be of such a choice. The article ends with a message to the Western world that it has a responsibility to consider and develop a change process relevant to local beliefs in developing nations with a constructive approach as a means to creating prosperity foremost in countries experiencing poverty, which Fairbanks mentions is a serious and all-too-common issue.

 

Introduction

Taking a macroeconomic perspective, this paper examines the process towards prosperity by applying the model developed by Fairbanks (2000) in the context of the change experienced by the education sector during the transition two decades ago of Hungary from a budget-commanded socialist regime to a market-oriented free market operation. Another issue to be considered is whether aspects of this change process could also be used on the micro level for the changes occurring in the merger of a higher education system.

 

The macro-perspective

When considering the macro perspective of the education sector during transition, Radó (2001: 11) declares, ‘The systematic vision of the transition in education … can be characterized as a move from a “command-driven” system to a “demand-driven” system’.

Change for prosperity is a global issue and in terms of the education sector, levels of prosperity during the transition are hard to gauge, however certain points are worth considering. The old fashioned education system had its weaknesses, but it also had its strengths such as high enrolment rates, universal and free enrolment, a generous supply of teachers and buildings and high levels of achievement of pupils in mathematics and science. In fact, this would be seen by many educators as a prosperous education system.

Fairbanks lists the steps as part of a process for change and each of these can be considered from the point of view of the educational sector in Hungary during the transition period towards a market oriented operation.

 

Step one: Decode the current strategy for Prosperity

When considering the strategy, a retrospective approach is required to find the strategy used in the period of transition in Hungary. According to Kornai (2000: 10), during the transition the strategy could be described as an organic one – a strategy of organic development. This strategy is characterized by creating favourable conditions for growth in the private sector (mass ‘de novo’ entry), privatization of most previously state-owned companies, companies having a ‘core’ owner and hard budget restraints on companies. Through this, the private sector’s proportion of gross production grew thanks to new private businesses and the shrinking of the state sector. This also meant an initial heavy reliance on Foreign Direct Investment and privatised industries.

            This adopted strategy also has a sociological aspect according to Kornai (2000). It incurs a process of ‘embourgeoisement’ with the development of a property-owning class.

            Lipton and Sachs (1990) refer to a strategy of transition which involves the likes of ending excess demand, budget restraints, creating market competition and privatization, many of the steps in this strategy could also be applied to Hungary and can be seen in the organic strategy suggested by Kornai.

 

Step two: Create a sense of urgency

When considering Hungarian teachers and perhaps many citizens in Hungary during the time of transition, there were great expectations that change was on its way and Hungary was about to join with Western countries, which in turn gave expectations about achieving the same standard of living and freedoms that weren’t available before. In this way, it could be said that there was a sense of urgency to become more market-focussed and ‘Westernized’ rather than risk the potential danger of reverting bank. In reality this would be a long process, but the expectations served as a means of creating this sense of urgency referred to by Sachs. The main impetus for this sense of urgency could be attributed to the people themselves rather than the government or the private sector although each had a role to play to some extent.

There are two other factors mentioned by Radó (2001) which could be seen as promoting a sense of urgency for change in the educational institutions in Hungary. The first is that of the reform of the governance system, including the rapidly emerging NGO sector and the appearance of private education. The second factor being a key impetus for public educational institutions is to consider becoming more competitive and, in order to achieve this, more market-oriented (Rado, 2001: 21).

 

Step three: Understand the range of strategic choices and inform them with analyses

When faced with the transition, a number of approaches from the West for education were considered in Hungary. The main four put forward by Radó (2001: 21) were as follows:

The same for all. This approach is based on social equality with a focus on systematic outcomes like graduation rates. The reform strategy is to maintain centralization and privatization is opposed.
Quality for those who deserve it. This is an elitist approach and the strategy promotes centralization and liberalization at the same time.
Quality for those who can afford it. This free market approach presents a view of a decentralized and liberalized education system, with full support for privatisation.
Quality for all. This approach supports decentralization and liberalization, but with only some support for privatization.

 

However, when considering the strategic choices available, there are a number of other factors that need to be considered. First of all, the educational sector in Hungary during the transition is making a change from a “command-driven” system to a “demand-driven” system. This factor is key when considering strategy and policy in Hungary. Appendix 1 shows the differences between the two systems according to Radó (2001: 24). The other factor is that of Hungary’s culture and attitudes to reform. Any strategy on a macro-level should consider Hungary’s specific situation not only economically and politically, but also culturally – adoption of a strategy based on Western approaches without such consideration would have a much smaller chance of success. In fact, educational reform in transition countries was carried out in a very different way to that of Western-European countries (see Appendix 2).

 

Step four: Create a compelling vision

When considering a compelling vision to promote change, it is worth noting that during the transition period there was a significant momentum for change in Hungary (Rado, 2001: 22). Such a momentum for change is rare and an important foundation upon which a compelling vision was built. From a macro point of view, the increased freedom experienced at the time of transition lead to a vision that was more aware of the surrounding environment as people experienced freedom to travel, labour mobility and freedom to trade with any markets abroad, just to name a few examples.

In the case of transition of the education sector, the vision was the demand-driven system retained many of the characteristics existing in education in developed countries in the West and for many, the compelling vision was the countries in the West with higher standards of living, high productivity and free markets. 

Evidence of a compelling vision was referred to by Kaufman and Paulston (1991: 11), Hungarians saw their nation as a leader in change and this pride in change not reinforces the fact that Hungarians had a compelling vision for change but also that the task of communicating the change was much each (see step seven).

 

Step five: Create new networks of relationships

It has been argued before that productive coalitions between management of educational institutions and companies would result in greater relevance of courses to company and students needs, both of which can be considered as forms of customer in terms of receiving the skills or skilled labour or knowledge supplied by educational institutions, however this such coalitions have yet to be implemented to a level comparable with that of many market-oriented Western countries (Chandler, 2008). 

New networks and were made and existing ones strengthened between Hungarian HEIs and educational institutions in the West and as Western HEIs such as those in the UK were becoming increasingly market-oriented in the early nineties this also created a further impetus for Hungarian HEIs to do likewise.

 

Step six: Communicate the vision

When considering reform in education, there are a number of key stakeholders that need to be considered as requiring communication of the vision: Teachers, Management, students (and students’ parents), the Government and to some extent, the public at large.

Whilst it could be argued that various types of media could be used to achieve this, it seems that in education, change is brought about in a different way. According to Radó (2001) reform in transition countries often takes place as either a “top-down” or “bottom-up” process. From the point of view of the thesis, this would mean that in the educational institution, change can be achieved through the medium of the teachers as they are right in the middle of the process, whether it is “top-down” or “bottom-up”. Thus teachers appear to feature as the main stakeholder to whom the vision should be communicated and, as reforms are generally initiated by the government and then communicated to educational management, the top-down process seems to be the most likely way to achieve this.

As teachers are central to communicating the vision and the vision during the transition (as mentioned in step four) is a Western system, the views of teachers towards the Western system during the time of transition need consideration.  According to the research of Kaufman and Paulston (1991: 9), out of eighteen teachers interviewed in their research, the majority favoured a Western focus with only one indicating a need to concentrate on national uniqueness and national pride. Another finding of this research was that in Hungary the rural population tended to favour nationalism and the urban population had a more European focus (Kaufman and Paulston, 1991: 10). When communicating the vision it would seem that for teachers, the vision was already on board to some extent, however for educational institutions in rural areas there would have been opposition from local residents (including students and parents). From Fairbanks’ process for change, this would imply a greater need to communicate effectively the vision in rural areas with potential opposition to change in Hungary.

In the case of Hungary the vision of a ‘Western lifestyle’ began even prior to the transition itself and not through the media listed by Fairbanks as such would not have been allowed or available at the time. Rather, it was through such events as vacationing at Lake Balaton where Hungarians met with family members from the West and so they were exposed to Western values and consumer goods, all of which served to ‘whet the appetites’ of Hungarians (Kaufman and Paulston, 1991: 17), and thus, serve as a means by which a compelling vision (of the West) was initially put forward to Hungarians.

            A number of other tools were used to internalize new ways of thinking in the education sector in Hungary. For example, a national supply of curricular programs with a national standard format, an electronic communication network to transfer information to schools and a new in-service training system (Halász, 2002: 8).

 

Step seven: Build productive coalitions

            One of the strengths during the transition of the education sector in Hungary was that of certain coalitions. Extensive participation by teachers in conferences, input from the professional public with surveys and strong professional groups (e.g. curriculum development advisers and innovative teachers), all served as effective coalitions with educational institutions in the push for reform (Halász, 2002: 10).

 

Step eight: Develop and Communicate short-term wins (demonstrations of success to coerce change)

One key short-term win (with long term benefits) for the education sector in Hungary was that of “comparative advantage” for newcomers (Rado, 2001: 22), which is well-known in the history of various economies and these previous cases, such as Germany building modern railways in the middle of the 19th century, were used to demonstrate the potential success for Hungary and through this, promote change.

Communicating these short-term wins seems especially important in the case of Hungary as at the time of transition there was a mood of uncertainty and hesitancy due to the fact that Hungarians have often seen themselves as victims (Kaufman and Paulston, 1991: 13) due to a rather tough history of treatment and subjugation[1]. This mood could easily mean that any suffering caused during the transition would lead to a revert back to the old ways, however these short-term wins would reinforce the fact that in this case Hungarian are winners rather than victims and promote some level of assurance.

The need for short-term wins is further reinforced by the appearance of short term losses. According to Halász (2002: 5), the economic change also brought with it an economic crisis meaning a scarcity of resources in educational institutions, which in turn could be seen as creating nostalgia towards the former centralised model where resources were more freely available. This would be further accentuated by the budget costs forcing down teachers salaries between 1994 and 1996. Although not mentioned by Fairbanks, it could be said that for every short term loss that were to appear, there would be a greater need to communicate short-term wins so as to reinforce the change and prevent reverting to the previous condition Lewin (1951).

 

Step nine: Institutionalize the changes (Institutions provide new norms of behaviour)

The idea by Fairbanks here is further reinforced by Kornai (2000: 23) when referring to change in the education sector in Hungary as he mentions that ‘for growth to be sustainable there has to be … a deep comprehensive program of institutional reforms’.

When considering Hungary’s turn towards a market orientation during the time of transition, it should be mentioned that many of the institutions conducive to a market economy such as company law and a market friendly tax system were created before the fall of communism and were stable enough to survive the democratic elections of the early nineties. The work of Halász (2002) refers to a number of key steps of institutionalization in Hungary:  

 

1) The basic institutions conducive to this transition were in place, such as the parliamentary framework and laws on associations.

2) Through the 1993 Education Act in Hungary, introduced a new model of curriculum regulation and in doing so changed the way educational institutions operated. As such this Act can be seen as providing new norms of behaviour for educational institutions, which in turn would pass these norms on to stakeholders such as students, teachers and parents. A further Amendment to the Act in 1996 served as further development of these new norms.

            3) A step towards becoming less centralized and more market-focussed was achieved through the 1990 Law on Self governments when ownership of state schools was handed over to local communities. (Although in some cases this step served to heighten the differences between the new decentralised system of public education and certain unchanged mechanisms such as curriculum regulation).

             Furthermore, various institutions were set up such as the National Institute for Public Education (set up in 1990) and as a result of the Education Act, the institution of the school board, on which the parents, the school and the maintaining authority were represented, was introduced in order to guarantee social control over schools (NIPE, 1996).

            Although not specified by Sachs it would seem that the institutionalizing of the changes also serves as a means of sustainability of change for the long term.

 

Step ten: Evaluate and affirm the changes (Summits, venues for discussion of results, measurements of results and room for improvement)

Following the reforms due to the Education Act in 1993 and the Amendment in 1996, by 1998 debates were being held in connection with this, involving politicians, researchers and pressure groups (Halász, 2002: 3), which can be seen as a form of evaluation of the results of these changes. The new curriculum was also evaluated by nationally accredited experts according to Halász (2002) and subject to the approval of the local municipality running the school. Not only this, but a national survey was conducted in 1998 to monitor the impact of these reforms and according to the results, modifications to the legislation was considered. Through this the Modification of the Education Act in 1999 came about.

 

Conclusions

In view of the current situation as stipulated in the thesis, there is a lot of scope for considering the period of change and acculturation through mergers and becoming market-driven through the eyes of Fairbanks. The current reforms are indeed reforms with a view to prosperity and as such, it will be interesting to see if the institution adopts a similar process to that put forward by Fairbanks, or not.

            Through this study of the transition period in Hungary in the education sector, there are clearly many issues listed here that could also be considered for an individual institution undergoing a similar change from budget-centred to market-focussed. Without risking the danger of a fallacy of composition by applying a macroeconomic process model to the microeconomic context of the thesis, it could still be said that certain aspects of the process put forward by Fairbanks could be adapted for usage on a smaller scale such as for an educational institution. Although clearly some steps in the change process put forward by Fairbanks would need modifying or in steps such as ‘institutionalizing reforms’ outright deletion. 

In terms if the thesis, if the Sachs approach is considered on a micro scale in terms of the thesis there are a number of factors that can be considered. Firstly, the current strategy for prosperity is basically to become market-oriented (step one). This is a very general strategy but in an HEI this covers a huge number of areas from course planning, to bureaucracy and treatment of students and in turn will mean vast changes in mental models for teachers, management and students alike. In terms of the HEI in the thesis, creating a sense of urgency (step two), the expectations would be rather limited – many institutions such as the one on the thesis are slow to change and it is often resisted – as the Hungarian expression goes: “the wheels of power turn slowly”. The status quo is comfortable and the need to become market oriented would certainly increase workload and require effort and time. Such expectations might well limit the urgency and constitute a major hurdle to overcome. The key to this might be in the steps of Sachs of creating a compelling vision, communicating the vision and communicating short-term wins and in this way, resistance to change can be minimised. It is worth considering that Hungarians can often be rather short-term in their thinking and as such the last step mentioned might be the most effective. Communicating a vision to teachers to instigate change will certainly require more than an occasional meeting. It will be interesting to see how the change is handled in reality.

            Other steps of relevance might include creating new networks of relationships. In order to become more market focussed (and more cost efficient) the three colleges (faculties) are to merge. As new subcultures are formed and new norms and values and introduced, this is no bad thing as it means that the former values and norms are being replaced. This might also be a good time to create and communicate the vision – before the new set of values becomes entrenched. Another important step would be to create coalitions. In fact, in my view, this is more important than the vision in terms of the HEI becoming more market oriented. Through stronger and closer relationships with employers and institutions abroad, teachers and management are much more likely to see the opportunities and the threats existing in the education market and, as the budget is reduced and there is a greater dependence on income from other sources such as EU tenders and foreign students, and in themselves create a vision and strategy based on the knowledge gained from such coalitions.   

Evaluation of the change is the last step referred to by Sachs and in the case of Hungary, such evaluations and feedback are relatively new – it is only in recent years that teachers themselves at the HEI in the thesis have started to receive feedback from students by means of end-of-term questionnaires, prior to this it was unheard-of. This might be a tough step for management and other stakeholders to take and criticism of any change will need to be handled carefully and constructively.

Considering the issue of whether or not Hungarians HEI are still undergoing transition, as mentioned by Radó (2001:25) ‘reform in education is not a linear and continuous process’ and it really does seems to be a case of ‘one step forward and two steps back’. The institution in the thesis has changed little over the past few decades. In fact the changes that occurred during the transition were not so much about being demand-driven (which is happening currently) but about changing the regime. The main changes are as follows: -

 1)      The curriculum change of dropping mandated Russian language instruction;

2)      Redefining school to include private and church affiliated schools;

3)      The impacts of an economic and political restructuring on the existing system.

 Furthermore, the impact of the changes during the transition in Hungary towards a market oriented  system could be considered as possible expected changes of an educational institution (such as more open community involvement, cross disciplinary approaches, an increase in in-service training and a greater sense of professionalism).

            When considering Fairbanks’ model of the process of change towards prosperity, it is worth considering in this case the work of Fullan (1991). Fullan (1991) focussed on change and the process of change but with a specialization in educational change. Fullan (1991) identified four steps in the change process: Initiation, Implementation, Continuation and Outcome. The key one for this assignment is Implementation and is according to Fuller (1991) covers four main factors: 1) the need, 2) clarity of goals and needs, 3) complexity: the extent of change required to those responsible for implementation and 4) quality / practicality of the change.  Fullan’s research could in fact be seen as dealing with the strategy for change (step three), whereas Fairbanks goes beyond this. Halász (2002) refers to certain specific features for consideration and in turn, these need to be considered when writing the thesis. The relating of the work of Halász to that of Fairbanks can be found in Appendix 3. Thus overall, Fairbanks (2000) agrees with a lot of the features put forward by Halász (2002) even though Fairbanks deals with a generalist model not specifically concerned with the education sector.

            In summary, Fairbanks process for change to prosperity can be considered on many levels as relevant to the thesis. By looking at Hungary’s education sector during transition toward a market-orientation, it is easy to see areas that could be considered in the management of a change of a higher education institution. That is not to say that the macro can be applied on a microeconomic level or that the issues involved in changing an organisational culture, strategy and structure are the same as the complexities of similar changes on a national scale. They clearly are not, but issues raised on a national level, such as obstacles to change and the importance of communicating short-term wins could be considered as possible issues on a microeconomic level as well.

 

[1] Such as the slaughter of protesters in 1919, the loss of 75% of Hungarian land after World War I and the 1956 revolution in which thousands lost their lives.

 

References

Chandler, N., (2008). The supply and demand of core competencies: a study of the relationship between employers and the Budapest Business School. Dissertation Paper. Budapest Business School library

Fairbanks, M., (2000). Changing the Mind of a Nation: Elements in a Process for Creating Prosperity, in Culture Matters, Lawrence E. Harrison and Samuel P. Huntington, editors, (New York: Basic Books), 2000, pp.270-281

Freeman, K., (2003). Higher education and multinational corporations: establishing a mutual bond, Policy Futures in Education, Volume 1, No. 2

Fullan, M., Stiegelbauer, S., (1991). The new meaning of educational change. 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press

Griffin, A., (1994). Transferring learning in higher education: problems and possibilities, in R. Barnett (ed.) , Academic community: discourse of disorder?, London: Jessica Kingsley

Halász, G., (2002). Educational change and social transition in Hungary. National Institute of Public Education, Budapest. Available at: http://www.see-educoop.net/education_in/pdf/halasz_edu_change_in_hungary1-oth-enl-t00.pdf

Harrison, L.E., Huntington, S.P., (2000). Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, Basic Books, New York, NY

Harvey, L., (2000). New realities: the relationship between higher education and employment, Tertiary Education and Management, Volume 6, Number 1, 2000. Available at: http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:yV9zesWh5n8J:www.shu.ac.uk/research/cre/publications/eair99.pdf

Kaufman C., Paulston R., (1991). Hungarian education in transition. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, April 1991).

Kingston, P., (2006). Under new management: New proposals would put learners and bosses in charge of skills and training, The Guardian, December 12, 2006. Available at: http://education.guardian.co.uk/further/story/0,,1969689,00.html

Kornai J., (2000). Ten years’ after ‘The road to a free economy’ – the author’s self-evaluation. Paper for the World Bank ‘Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics – ABCDE’, April 18-20 2000.

Leitch Review of Skills, (2006). Prosperity for all in the global economy – world class skills, HM Treasury. Available at: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/leitch_review/review_leitch_index.cfm

Lewin, K. (1951) Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers. D. Cartwright (ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

Lipsett, A., (2007). Why higher education means business. The Guardian, Wednesday June 20, 2007. Available at: http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/news/story/0,,2107250,00.html

Lipton D., Sachs J., (1990). Creating a Market Economy in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. I, 1990

National Advisory Board for Public Sector Higher Education and the University Grants Committee, (1984). Higher Education and the Needs of Society, London: National Advisory Board for Public Sector Education/ University Grants Committee

National Institute for Public Education (NIPE), (1996). Education policy in the transition period. Available at: http://www.oki.hu/oldal.php?tipus=cikk&kod=EduHun96-03-Education

Radó P., (2001). Transition in education. Institute for Education Policy, Budapest. Available at: http://www.soros.org/initiatives/esp/articles_publications/publications/transition_20010401/rado.pdf

Sir John Daniel, (1998). Tectonic shifts in higher education, Arizona State University. Available at: http://www.open.ac.uk/johndanielspeeches/Arizona.html

Szentirmai, L., (2001). Role of Intellectual Capacity in the further Development of the European Union, Jean Monnet Group on the Future of Europe Conference, October 2001.

 

Appendices

Appendix 1: The typical characteristics of “command driven” and “demand driven” systems in the education sector

The “command driven” system

The “demand driven” system

 

Teaching is in the center of pedagogy, teachers are in the center of policies.

Learning is in the center of pedagogy, students are in the center of policies.

Focuses on resources, controls processes and does not really care about outcomes.

Focuses on learning outcomes, improves the quality of processes, adjusts resources.

Gives preference to institutional and structural policies.

Gives preference to functional policies (improvement and development).

Focuses on the amount of financial resources that is deployed for educational provisions.

Focuses on the cost effectiveness of educational provisions.

Policy is driven by political and/or ideological agendas.

Policy is driven by analysis and bargaining 

The system is centralized and controlled.

The system is decentralized and liberalized 

The flow of information is blocked and reduced, the absorptive capacity of “educationalists” is low at both middle and grassroot levels (obedient system)

The flow of information is free and fostered, the absorptive capacity of “educationalists” is high at all levels (learning systems).

The number of circles that are involved in policy development, is small, stakeholders are not organized.

The number of circles that are involved in policy development is big, stakeholders are organized, and bargaining is institutionalized

Source: Radó P., 2001. Transition in education. Institute for Education Policy, Budapest, p.24. Available at: http://www.soros.org/initiatives/esp/articles_publications/publications/transition_20010401/rado.pdf

 


Appendix 2: Educational reform – Western European and Central Eastern European Countries

 

In Western-European countries

In Central-Eastern European countries

Reform is considered to be a new wave of a basically organic process of change (i.e. reconstruction).

Reform is considered to be an almost complete systemic and structural change (i.e. rebuilding).

Mainly genuine educational considerations and those of the “final users” mainly drive reform.

Reform is – to a huge extent – driven by ideological and political considerations.

The external challenges to education are partly predictable.

The speed of the transformation of the economic and social environment is very high.

Reform is initiated because of concerns about the achievement of students and the quality of education.

Educational reform is an inherent component of the overall transition agenda.

Avoidance of major structural changes.

Strong focus on structural issues.

Reform is about the support of grass-root change.

Reform is about the top-down implementation of systemic changes

Reform is supported by an existing and extensive system of information (evaluation, assessment, research) and by formal channels of bargaining and public discourse.

Reform is partly about the creation of the basic conditions of informed and open policy making.

Source: Radó P., 2001. Transition in education. Institute for Education Policy, Budapest, p.30.  


Appendix 3: Relating the reform processes of Fairbanks to the specific work of Halász

 

Halász

Fairbanks

Educational changes are strongly related to processes outside the education sector.

Changes for prosperity on a macro level involving the private sector, governments, natural resources and so on

The change process is not a linear one

A sense of urgency required in terms of creating a need for change but the rate of change is not referred to.

The capacity to manage uncertainty is a critical factor.

Doesn’t refer to uncertainty per se, he does list factors which will reduce risk and uncertainty about the change such as creating a compelling vision and institutionalizing changes.

Higher level willingness to take risk is endemic to societies in transition.

Doesn’t refer to risk but refers to minimising risk at higher levels by understanding the range of strategic choices and analysing them. This is common sense although it can be conceded that there is always some risk involved in any change about to take place.

Communication and ongoing learning becomes particularly important.

Communication is important on a number of levels such as creating a compelling vision and new networks of relationships and communicating the vision.

Increasing efficiency in the use of resources occurs with the accumulation of experience.

Resources are a part of overall strategy such as the dangers of an over reliance on resources, but the issue of whether efficiency increases with experience is not touched upon.

A pragmatic approach focusing on the instruments of implementation predominates over abstract, theoretical conceptions of change.

Approach is very much pragmatic with detailed approaches and case studies to reinforce the point. The instruments such as those for communication are considered.

 

Source: Adapted from the works of Halász and Fairbanks (see Bibliography)

 

critical analysis of the case – T.M.A.Pai foundation v. State of karnataka, AIR 2003 SC 355 – through the view of minority of educational rights

OTHER RELEVANT DETAILS OF THIS CASE

Number of paragraphs; 450

Bench; 11 judge bench

B.N. Kirpal, Chief Justice

G.B. Pattanaik

S. Rajendrababu

K.G. Balakrishnan

Arjit Pasayat

U. N. Khare

Ruma Paul

Ashok Bhan

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri

P. Venkattarama Reddy

S.N.Variappa

Cases referred

1)      Ahmadabad St. Xaviers College v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1974 SC 1389 7 JUDGE BENCH

2)       In Re The Kerala Education Bill, [1959]1 SCR 995. 7JUDGE BENCH

3)      St. Stephens College v. University of Delhi,(1992) 1 SCC 558  5 JUDGE BENCH

4)      T.M.A PAI Foundation v. State of Karnataka, AIR 1994 SC 13 5 JUDGE BENCH

5) D.C.Wadhwa .v. State of Bihar AIR 1987 SC 579 5 JUDGE BENCH

6)      P.A. Inamdar & Otrs v. State of Maharashtra AIR 2005 SC 3226 7 JUDGE BENCH

7)      Unni Krishnan J.P & Otrs v. State of Andhra Pradesh AIR 1993 SC 2178 5 JUDGE BENCH

8)      D.A.V. College v. State of Punjab, AIR 1971 SC 1737 5 JUDGE BENCH

9)      State of Madras Vs Smt. Champakam Dorairajan,AIR 1951 SC 226. 7 JUDGE BENCH.

10)  Bal Patil and Anr v. Union Of India, (2005) 6 SCC 690

Minority

Under the title “Monkey Salvation for a Fish” Anthony de mello narrates the following;-

“What on earth are you doing?” said I to the monkey

When I saw him lift a fish out of the water and place it on the branch of a tree

“I am saving the fish from drowning” replied the monkey.

There is a danger that even the most benevolent majorities have this monkey’s salvation over minorities. This is exemplified in the oft repeated invitation to the minorities to dive into the national mainstream. The Supreme Court of India has saved itself from a monkey. The constitution bench of 11 Judges in the matter of T.M.A. Pai Foundation and others v. State of Karnataka, 2003 had a relook into the interpretation of the constitutional rights of the religious and linguistic minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. Apart from interpreting the content and extent of these rights and juxtaposing them with the so called similar rights of non minorities, the judges went into the question what is the meaning and content of the expression ‘minorities’ in Article 30? The expression “minority” has been derived from the Latin word ‘minor’ and the suffix ‘ity’ which means “small in number”. J.A. Laponee in his book “The Protection to Minority” describes “Minority” as a group of persons having different race, language or religion from that of majority of inhabitants. In the Year Book on Human Rights U.N. Publication 1950 ed. minority has been described as non dominant groups having different religion or linguistic traditions than the majority population.

Article 30(1) uses the terms ‘linguistic’ or ‘religious’ minorities. The word ‘or’ means that a minority may either be linguistic or religious and that it does not have to be both – a religious minority as well as linguistic minority. It is sufficient of it is one or the other or both. The constitution of India provides for special rights to both linguistic and religious minorities “to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice” under Article 30. Hence no such law can be framed as may discriminate against such minorities with regard to the establishment and administration of the educational institutions vis-à-vis other educational institutions. Article 30 is a special right conferred on the religious and linguistic minorities because of their numerical handicap and to inspire in them a sense of confidence. While upholding these rights, the Supreme Court has, in the TMA Pai case, also endorsed the concept that there should be no reverse discrimination and opines that “the essence of Article 30(1) is to ensure equal treatment between the majority and the minority institutions. No one type or category of institution should be disfavoured or, for that matter, receive more favourable treatment than another. Laws of the land, including rules and regulations, must apply equally to the majority institutions as well as to the minority institutions. The Supreme Court has time and again, in many judgements, ruled that minority status can be decided only by taking the state as a unit. It has reasoned that since ‘religious’ and ‘linguistic’ are mentioned at the same time in Article 30 of the constitution, and since the states were carved out in India by taking language as the criterion, the classification of ‘minority’ cannot be based on some other principle. Accordingly, a state government can confer minority status on an educational institute only after considering the socio-economic backwardness of the minorities in that state. This is the reason why, even though 90 per cent of the educational institutions (aided or unaided) in Kerala are run by person(s) belonging to the minority communities, the same have not been accorded minority status.

Constitutional right accorded to Minorities
(a) Article – 30
Article – 30(1) gives the linguistic or religious minorities the following two rights:
(a) The right to establish, and 
(b) The right to administer educational institutions of their choice.

Article – 30(2) bars the state, while granting aid to educational institutions, from discriminating against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a linguistic or a religious minority. It mandates that in granting aid to educational institutions, the state shall not discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on religion or language.

The minorities have been given protection under article 30 in order to preserve and strengthen the integrity and unity of the country. The sphere of general secular education will develop the commonness of boys and girls of India. This is in the true spirit of liberty, equality and fraternity through the medium of education. The minorities will feel isolated and separate if they are not given the protection of article 30 general secular education will open doors of perception and act as the natural light of mind for our countrymen to live in the whole. While moving the Draft Constitution in the Assembly on November 4, 1948, Dr. Ambedkar quoted Grote, the historian of Greece, who had said: “The constitutional morality, not merely among the majority of any community but throughout the whole, is an indispensable condition of government at once free and peaceable; since even any powerful and obstinate minority may render the working of a free institution impracticable without being strong enough to conquer the ascendancy for themselves.” It is quite possible to pervert the Constitution without changing its form. That is exactly what is taking place in India. That was exactly what Adolf Hitler did in Germany. Without altering the form of the Weimar Constitution, he destroyed the entire constitutional spirit and, in the end, the Constitution itself. Prof. Wadhwa in D.C.Wadhwa .v. State of Bihar gives a quotation from the Roman legalist Julius Paulus (B.C. 204): “One who does what a statute forbids transgresses the Statute; one who contravenes the intention of a Statute without disobeying its actual words, commits a fraud on it.” Auto-limitation and Self-scrutiny by the judiciary: vitiates Constitutional morality and judicial values?

Now let us come to the topic. The case of T.M.A.PAI foundation is a landmark case which deals with the rights of minorities in India, which often I feel in this nation has not yet been recognised. We say India is a home to various cultures, different people and different languages. And we say that there is UNITY IN DIVERSITY. But in my personal opinion I don’t feel so… because still allot of people have been subdued under the hands of the most power handed majorities.

A brief idea about the previous and present landmark decisions that plays its due role in the rights of minorities

State of Madras v. Champakam durai rajan

It was this judgment that necessitated the Constitution First Amendment, which added Clause (4) to Article 15. It will be noticed in Article 29 that while Cl. (1) protects the language, script or culture of a section of the citizens, cl. (2) guarantees the fundamental right of an individual citizen. The right to get admission into any educational institution of the kind mentioned in Cl. (2) is a right which an individual citizen has as a citizen and not as a member of any community or class of citizens. This right is not to be denied to the citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, language or any of them. If a citizen who seeks admission into any such educational institution has not the requisite academic qualifications and is denied admission on that ground, he certainly cannot be heard to complain of an infraction of his fundamental right under this Article. But, on the other hand, if he has the academic qualifications but is refused admission only on grounds of religion, race, caste, language or any of them, then there is a clear breach of his fundamental right. The section of the people, in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, and with protecting them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation. It is pointed out that although this Article finds a place in Part IV of the Constitution which lays down certain directive principles of State policy and though the provisions contained in that Part are not enforceable by any Court. the principles therein laid down are nevertheless fundamental for the governance of the country and Art. 37 makes it obligatory on the part of the State to apply those principles in making laws. The argument is that having regard to the provisions of Art. 46, the State is entitled to maintain the Communal G. O. fixing proportionate seats for different communities and if because of that Order, which is thus contended to be valid in law and not in violation of the Constitution, the petnrs. are unable to get admissions into the educational institutions, there is no infringement of their fundamental rights. Indeed, the learned Advocate-General of Madras even contends that the provisions of Art. 46 override the provisions of Art.29 (2).

Re. Kerala Education Bill

The ruling in this case has been reiterated by the Supreme Court in Guru Nanak University case. In that case, the Supreme Court rejected the contention of the state of Punjab that a religious or linguistic minority should be a minority in relation to the entire population of India. The Court has ruled that a minority has to be determined, in relation to the particular legislation which is sought to be impugned. If it is a state law, the minorities have to be determined in relation to the state population. The Hindus in Punjab constitute a religious minority. Therefore, Arya Samajistis in Punjab also constitute a religious minority having their own distinct language and script. It is within the realm of possibility that the population of a state may be so fragmented that no linguistic or religious group may by itself constitute 50 percent of the total state population. In such a situation, every group will fall within the umbrella of Art. 30(1) without there being a majority group in the state against which minorities need to claim protection.

The Court has pointed out that if various sections and classes of the Hindus were to be regarded as ‘minorities’ under art. 30(1), then the Hindus would be divided into numerous sections and classes and cease to be a majority any longer. The sections of one religion cannot constitute religious minorities. The term ‘minority based on religion’ should be restricted only to those religious minorities, e.g. Muslims, Christians, Jains, Buddhists, Sikhs, etc., which have kept their identity separate from the majority, namely, the Hindus. The provision of article 30(1) does not however mean that the state can impose no regulations on the minority institutions. In this case, the Supreme Court also observed: “The right conferred on the religious and linguistic minorities to administer educational institutions of their choice is not an absolute right”. It has to be read with regulatory power of the state. Regulations which do not affect the substance of the guaranteed rights, but ensure the excellence of the institutions and its proper functioning in matters educational, are permissible.

In this case the question arose as to “whether the minority community was to be determined on the basis of the entire population of India, or on the basis of the population of the state forming a part of the union. It has been contended by the state of Kerala that for claiming the status of minority, the persons must numerically be a minority in the particular region in which the educational institution was situated, and that the locality or ward or town where the institution was to be situated has to be taken as the unity to determine the minority community. No final opinion on this question was expressed, but it was observed at SCR p.1050 that as the Kerala Education Bill “extends to the whole of the state of Kerala and consequently the minority must be determined by reference to the entire population of that state.” In the two cases pertaining to D.A.V.College, this court had to consider whether the Hindus were a religious minority in the Guru Nanak college case the question posed was as to what constituted a religious or linguistic minority, and how it was to be determined… after examining the opinion of this court in the Kerala Education Bill, 1957 case the court held that the Arya Samajistis, who were Hindus, were a religious minority in the state of Punjab, even though they may not have been so in relation to the entire country. In the 1971 D.A.V.College case it was stated that “what constitutes a linguistic or religious minority must be judged in relation to the state inasmuch as the impugned Act is a State Act and not in relation to the whole of India.” The Supreme Court rejected the contention that since Hindus were a majority in India, they could not be a religious minority in the state of Punjab, as it took the state as the unit to determine whether the Hindus were a minority community. There can, therefore, be little doubt that this court has consistently held that, with regard to a state law, the unit to determine a religious or linguistic minority can only be the state. The forty second amendment to the constitution included education in the concurrent list under Entry 25. Would this in any way change the position with regard to the determination of a “religious” or “linguistic minority” for the purpose of Article 30?As a result of the insertion of Entry 25 into List III, parliament can now legislate in relation to education, which was only a state subject previously. The jurisdiction of Parliament is to make laws for the whole or a part of India. It is well recognized that geographical classification is not violative of Article 14. It would therefore, be possible that, with respect to a particular state or group of states, parliament may legislate in relation to education. However, Article 30 gives the right to a linguistic or religious minority of a state to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. The minority for the purpose of Article 30 cannot have different meanings depending upon who is legislating. Language being the basis for establishment of different states for the purposes of Article 30, a “linguistic minority” will have to be determined in relation to the state in which the educational institution is sought to be established. The position with regard to the religious minority is similar, since both religious and linguistic minorities have been put on par in Article 30.

Ahmadabad St. Xaviers College v. Government of Gujarat

Here in this case it was observed by the court that: “Every educational institution irrespective of community to which it belongs is a ‘melting pot’ in our national life” and that it is essential that there should be a “proper mix of students of different communities in all educational institutions.” This means that a minority institution cannot refuse admission to students of other minority and majority communities. The Supreme Court in this case has pointed out that the spirit behind article 30(1) is the conscience of the nation that the minorities, religious as well as linguistic, are not prohibited from establishing and administering educational institutions of their choice for the purpose of giving their children the best general education to make them complete men and women of the country. As K.K. Mathew, J. has observed supporting the majority view in this case: “It is upon the principal and teachers of a college that the tone and temper of an educational institution depend. On them would depend its reputation, the maintenance of discipline and its efficiency in teaching. The right to choose the principal and to have the teaching conducted by teachers appointed by the management after an overall assessment of their outlook and philosophy is perhaps the most important facet of the right to administer and educational institution”, and also the Supreme Court has rightly pointed out, “The whole object of conferring the right on the minorities under Article 30 is to ensure that there will be equality between the majority and the minority. If the minorities do not have such special protection they will be denied equality.”

St. Stephen’s College v. University of Delhi

The Court ruled out that college was established and administered by a minority community, viz., the Christian community which is indisputably a religious minority in India as well as in the union territory of Delhi where the college is located and hence enjoys the status of a minority institution. On the question of admission of students of the concerned minority community, the court has ruled that, according to article 30(1), the minorities whether based on religion or language have the right “to establish and administer” educational institutions of their choice and the right to select students for admission is a part of administration. On this point, the court has observed: “It is indeed an important facet of administration. This power also could be regulated but the regulation must be reasonable just like any other regulation. It should be conducive to the welfare of the minority institution or for the betterment of those who resort to it.” There is also the question of fees chargeable by the unaided minority institution from its students. The reason is that unaided institutions have to meet the cost of importing education from their own resources and the main source can only be the fees collected from the students. But these institutions cannot be permitted to indulge in commercialization of education. Therefore, it would not be unconstitutional for the government to issue an order which places a restriction on the amount of fee chargeable by an institution, if, on facts, the minority institutions indulge in commercialization of education and maladministration of the educational institutions. Medium of Instruction – The right of a minority to establish and administer educational institutions of its choice also carries with it the right to impart instruction to its children in its own language. The result of reading articles 29(1) and 30(1) together is that the minority has the choice of medium of instruction and the power of the state to determine the medium of instruction has, therefore, to yield ground, to the extent it is necessary to give effect to this minority right. The most significant case on this point is the D.A.V College, Bhatinada v. State of Punjab. By a notification, the Punjab Government compulsorily affiliated certain colleges to the Punjab University which prescribed Punjabi in the Gurumukhi script as the sole and exclusive medium of instruction and examination for certain courses. The Supreme Court declared that it violated the right of the Arya Samajistis to use their own script in the colleges run by them and compulsorily affiliated to the University. The constitution uses the term ‘minority’ without defining it. In this case, the Supreme Court also opined that while it is easy to say that minority means a community which is numerically less than 50 per cent, the important question is 50 % of what constitutes minority? Should it be of the entire population of India? Or of a state?  Or a part thereof? It is possible that a community may be in majority in a state but in a minority in the whole of India. A community may be concentrated in a part of a state and may thus be in majority there, though it may be in minority in the state as a whole. If a part of a state is to be taken, then the question is where to draw the line and what is to be taken into consideration a district, town, a municipality or its wards. The court delved into the issue of minority educational institutions and the parameters of their operational freedom. It was held that a minority institution had a right to establish an educational institution. On the question of whether such a minority institution could be directed to adopt a uniform selection criteria, the court ruled that if the selection or interview was based on candidate’s academic record, as well as performance at the interview, such procedure cannot be disturbed by a university directive. Merely getting on state aid such institution would not be covered by Article 29(2) {which prohibits denial of admission on grounds of religion alone} and lose its protection under Article 30(1) {right of minorities to establish an educational institution}. However, a minority cannot establish educational institutions for its exclusive benefit. It can accord preference to members of its own community up to a maximum of 50% of the annual admission.

The Unnikrishnan case

The scheme in this case has the effect of nationalizing education in respect of important features like the right of a private unaided institution to give admission and to fix the fee. By framing this scheme, which has led to the state governments legislating in conformity with the scheme, the private institutions are indistinguishable from the government institutions; curtailing all the essential features of the right of administration of a private unaided educational institution can neither be called fair nor reasonable.  This point has been observed in this decision in Para 194. The wide amplitude of the right conferred in Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka, 1992 case was restricted by the court in this case. It held that the right to education related only to basic education and state provision for higher education would depend upon its economic capacity. Whereas private educational institutions could charge a fee higher than government institutions, the amount could not be a capitation fee in disguise. Commercialization of education was not permissible. The court framed a detailed scheme to minimize discretion of private educational institutions in matters of admission and levy of fees.  The Hon’ble Supreme Court in this Unni Krishnan’s case has laid down a formula to bring about a partnership between the Public Sector and the Private Sector to work together for the development of higher education. The Government has since developed mechanisms to prevent commercialization and at the same time rope in the Private Sector to provide higher education to its citizens. The meaning of the word life includes the right to live in fair and reasonable conditions, right to rehabilitation after release, right to live hood by legal means and decent environment. The expanded scope of Article 21 has been explained by the Apex Court in the Unni Krishnan’s case and the Apex Court itself provided the list of some of the rights covered under

Article 21 on the basis of earlier pronouncements and some of them are listed below:
(1) The right to go abroad.
(2) The right to privacy.
(3) The right against solitary confinement.
(4) The right against hand cuffing.
(5) The right against delayed execution.
(6) The right to shelter. 
(7) The right against custodial death.
(8) The right against public hanging.
(9) Doctors assistance.

It was observed in Unni Krishnan’s case that Article 21 is the heart of Fundamental Rights and it has extended the Scope of Article 21 by observing that the life includes the education as well as, as the right to education flows from the right to life. As a result of expansion of the scope of Article 21, the Public Interest Litigations in respect of children in jail being entitled to special protection, health hazards due to pollution and harmful drugs, housing for beggars, immediate medical aid to injured persons, starvation deaths, the right to know, the right to open trial, inhuman conditions in aftercare home have found place under it. Through various judgments the Apex Court also included many of the non-justifiable Directive Principles embodied under part IV of the Constitution and some of the examples are as under:

(a) Right to pollution free water and air. 
(b) Protection of under-trial. 
(c) Right of every child to a full development.
(d) Protection of cultural heritage.

T.M.A. Pai case, 1994

Here the unaided Colleges are privately managed and raise their own funds. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that ‘the right to admit students being an essential facet of the right to administer educational institutions of their choice, as contemplated in Article 30 of the Constitution, the State Government or the University may not be entitled to interfere with that right, so long as the admission to the unaided educational institutions is on a transparent basis and the merit is adequately taken care of. The right to administer, not being absolute, there could be regulatory measures for ensuring educational standards and maintaining excellence thereof, and it is more so in the matter of admissions to professional institutions’. This was observed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in T.M.A.Pai Foundation and others v. State of Karnataka and others.

Article 30(1) postulate that the religious community will have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice meaning thereby that where a religious minority establishes an educational institution, it will have the right to administer that. The right to administer has been given to the minority, so that it can mould the institution as it thinks fit, and in accordance with its ideas of how the interest of the community in general, and the institution in particular, will be best served. For purpose of article 30(1), even a single philanthropic individual from the concerned minority can found the institution with his own means. A minority institution may impart general secular education; it need not confine itself only to the teaching of minority language, culture or religion. But to be treated as a minority institution, it must be shown that it serves or promotes in some manner the interests of the minority community by promoting its religious tenets, philosophy, culture, language or literature. The court addressed the issue of abolition of capitation fees pose Unnikrishnan and the scheme formulated for the admission of students. With the issue of the right of minority educational institutions pending consideration of a large bench, the court made a few modifications to the scheme to facilitate smoother functioning and gave interim directions. It also directed the Reserve Bank of India to formulate schemes to provide educational loans.

T.M.A. Pai foundation v. state of Karnataka, 2003

An 11 judge bench of the Supreme Court headed by Chief Justice B.N. Kripal held that the state governments and universities cannot regulate the admission policy of unaided educational institutions run by linguistic and religious minorities, but state governments and universities can specify academic qualifications for students and make rules and regulations for maintaining academic standards. The same principle applies in appointment of teachers and other staff. An unaided minority educational institution would be free to hire as it pleased as long as some essential qualifications were adhered to. In this case a number of petitions were filed by the management of minority educational institutions challenging the unnecessary control exercised by the government in various rules and regulations and hampering their progress of quality education. They contended the right in Article 30 which gives them full autonomy in running their institutions. In all the court framed five questions which are to be considered in these petitions

1)      What is the extent of control of state on minority institutions?

2)      What should be the procedure for admission of students?

3)      Will eligibility be confined to minority students or students of other community?

4)      Who is minority and how is to be determined?

5)      Whether these rights are available to minorities only or to other communities?

 

After the 11 judge bench decision in T.M.A. Pai’s case it was thought that the controversies regarding minority educational institution was finally settled. But the subsequent events showed different signs. These signs are due to the loop holes in the above said case. It was observed that the principles laid down in T.M.A. Pai’s case were so broadly formulated that it gave enough scope to apply those principles in different ways by the High Courts. The result was that the high court was flooded with writ petitions seeking for the settlement of various issues which remained unsolved. The constitution of India extends protection to minorities in different ways. Even though the constitution does not define the term minority it mentions of religious, linguistic and cultural minorities in articles 29 and 30. In India minorities are of diverse kinds given its pluralistic composition and multicultural history. There are religious, linguistic and cultural minorities and minorities possessing special scripts of their own, untouchable, socially and educationally backward classes schedule caste and schedule tribes. Throughout the years the term minority was subjected to judicial interpretation by the Supreme Court and many High Courts and has acquired legal and constitutional connotations which are consistent with the sociological concept regarding minority. It is noted that articles 29 and 30 of the constitution of India is based on culture, language, script or religion should not be compelled by the circumstances to give up their language, script or religion which should not be compelled by the circumstances to give up their culture, script or religion. The right to establish and administer private unaided non minority educational institutions broadly comprises the following rights;

To admit students;
To set up a reasonable fee structure;
To constitute a governing body;
To appoint staff (teaching and non teaching)
To take action if there is failure of duty on the part of any employees.

 

With regard to the core components of the rights under Article 19 and 26(a), it must be held that while the state has the right to prescribe qualifications necessary for admission, private unaided colleges have the right to admit students of their choice, subject to an objective and rational procedure of selection and the compliance with conditions, if any, requiring admission of a small percentage of students belonging to weaker sections of the society by granting them freeships or scholarships, if not granted by the government. The right to establish an educational institution can be regulated; but such regulatory measures must, in general, be to ensure the maintenance of proper academic standards, atmosphere and infrastructure (including qualified staff) and the prevention of maladministration. Article 30(1) deals with religious minorities and linguistic minorities. The opening words of the Article makes it clear that religious and linguistic minorities have been put on par, insofar as that Article is concerned. Therefore, whatever the unit whether a state or the whole of India for religious minority. India is divided into different linguistic states. The states have been carved out on the basis of the language of majority of persons of that region. For example the state of Maharashtra has been established on the basis of the language (Marathi) of that region. “Linguistic minority” can, therefore, logically only be in relation to a particular state. If the determination of such minority for the purpose of Article 30 is to be in relation to the whole of India, then within the state of Maharashtra, Marathi speakers will have to be regarded as linguistic minority. This will clearly contrary to the concept of linguistic states. If therefore, the state has to be regarded as the unit for determining “linguistic minority”. This will clearly be contrary to the concept of linguistic states. Articles 29 and 30 are a group of articles relating to cultural and educational rights. Article 29(1) gives the right to any section of citizens residing in India or any part thereof, and having a distinct language, script or culture of its own, to conserve the same. Article 29(1) does not refer to any religion, even though the marginal interest of the Article mentions about minorities. Article 29 (1) essentially refers to sections of citizens who have a distinct language, script or culture, even though their religion may not be the same. The widespread notion that runs through Article 29(1) is language, script or culture and not religion. For example, if in any part of the country, there is a section of society that has a distinct language, they are entitled to conserve the same, even though the persons having that language may profess different religions. Article 29(1) gives the right to all sections of citizens, whether they are in a minority or majority religion, to conserve their language, script or culture. In the exercise of this right to conserve the language, script or culture, that section of the society can setup educational institutions. The right to establish and maintain educational institutions of its choice is necessarily related to the right conferred by Article 30. The right under Article 30 is not absolute. Article 29(2) provides that, where any educational institution is maintained by the state or receives aid out of state funds, no citizen shall be denied admission on the grounds of religion, race, caste, language or any of them. The use of the expression “any educational institution” in Article 29(2) would refer to any educational institution established and administered by anyone, but which is maintained by the state or receives aid from funds of the state. In other words in an ordinary sense, state maintained or aided educational institutions, whether established by the government or the majority or a minority community cannot deny admission to a citizen on the grounds only of religion, race, caste or language. The right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions is provided by Article 30(1). To some extent, Article 26(1) (a) and Article 30(1) overlap, insofar as they relate to the administer of educational institutions; but whereas Article 26 gives right to both the majority as well as minority institutions to establish and administer educational institutions.

 

“The majority opinion spread over 30 printed pages, and minority opinion spread over 60 printed pages, both though illuminating and instructive, have none the less not summed up or pointedly answered the questions”. So came the P.A. Inamdar and others to appreciate and cull out the ratio decidendi of the two opinions and to examine if the clarification given in Islamic academy runs counter to Pai foundation

P.A. Inamdar and others v. State of Maharashtra, 2005

This case clearly pointed out that “the state can insist on private educational institutions which received no aid from the state to implement the state’s policy on reservation for granting admission on lesser percentage of marks i.e., on any criterion except merit (Para 1) and allowed freedom to unaided institution to devise their own fee structure subject to state regulations and thus the unaided educational institutions are blessed with unautocratic benefits; and there is no whisper of the connotation of the spirit of the Directive Principles of State Policy in relation to the state’s role to education its citizens
The decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in this decision has created ripples in the Educational sector. It has been held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court that Professional colleges would now enjoy full autonomy in admitting students. It has also been stated that in the absence of a State or a Central legislation regarding admissions and fee in professional colleges, the Legislative Committee which regulates admission, procedure, fee structure, etc. shall continue to exist. This case over ruled the decision of the 2003 T.M.A. Pai foundation case. The Inamdar case judgment of 2005 was a logical continuation of the TMA Pai Foundation case on the issue of admissions and administration in minority educational institutions. Interestingly, the Constitution makes special provisions for the minorities under Article 30, to establish and administer their educational institutions. In the Inamdar judgment, the Supreme Court extends the protection awarded to minority institutions to non-minority institutions as well. This is a significant departure in jurisprudence whereby unaided minority institutions have been equated with unaided non-minority institutions. The judgment extends the rights available under Article 19(1) (g) to “practice any profession or to carry on any occupation, trade or business”, to non-minority institutions. In the judgment, under the sub-heading Backdrop, education was described as an occupation. Education used to be charity or philanthropy in good old times. Gradually it became an ‘occupation’. Some of the judicial dicta go on to hold it as an ‘industry’. Whether to receive education is a fundamental right or not has been debated for quite some time. But it is settled that establishing and administering of an educational institution for imparting knowledge to the students is an occupation protected by Article 19(1) (g) and additionally by Article 26(a), if there is no element of profit generation. As of now, imparting education has come to be a means of livelihood for some professionals and a mission in life for some altruists”. The judgment also mentions that the State cannot ‘appropriate’ seats to provide them to reserved categories that are given admission with lower marks. “So far as appropriation of quota by the State and enforcement of its reservation policy is concerned, we do not see much difference between non-minority and minority unaided educational institutions. We find great force in the submission made on behalf of the petitioners that the States have no power to insist on seat sharing in the unaided private professional educational institutions by fixing a quota of seats between the management and the State. The State cannot insist on private educational institutions, which receive no aid from the State, to implement State policy on reservation for granting admission on lesser percentage of marks, i.e. on any criterion except merit”.

Bal patil and Anr v. Union of India

Minority as understood from constitutional scheme signifies an identifiable group of people or community who were seen as deserving protection from likely deprivation of their religious, cultural and educational rights by other communities who happen to be in majority and likely to gain political power in a democratic form of Government based on election”. The above definition does not include Disabled and Weaker Section also does not include disabled. The problem is that, even though SC & HC orders and / judgments many a times do not go in favor of disabled because it has no strong base for interpretation in the Constitution of India as the SCs & STs have. As far as the implementation part is concern it is a common problem for every law and its provisions. For Minority, According to this case, “Minority as understood from constitutional scheme signifies an identifiable group of people or community who were seen as deserving protection from likely deprivation of their religious, cultural and educational rights by other communities who happen to be in majority and likely to gain political power in a democratic form of Government based on election”. The above definition does not include Disabled and Weaker Section also does not include disabled. The problem is that, even though SC & HC orders and judgments many a times do not go in favor of disabled because it has no strong base for interpretation in the Constitution of India as the SCs & STs have. As far as the implementation part is in concern it is a common problem for each and every law and its provision and the situation that leads to the formation of such laws by the respected courts irrespective of its hierarchy.

Conclusion

The eleven judge bench in 2002 Pai’s case produced an Eastman colour spectrum in which 50% of the issues framed were left for regular bench for consideration and opened the floodgates of litigation. Then came the Islamic academy (2003) with 4 issues to clarify the stand of Pai’s case, the Supreme Court is pleased to deal with the legal nuance between ‘special right’ and ‘certain additional protection’ under Article 30(1) for minority institutions.  While analyzing the concept of right to education to poorer sections of the society, the historical T.M.A. Pai foundation case confused the concept, the Islamic academy case made it complex and finally Inamdar’s case has compounded the situation. This case has once again opened the lid of Pandora’s Box inviting a repulsive fur ore in our political, social and legal system. This case is a thing of interest, it being a thing of bitter controversy. It reminds us of a quote of Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer, an adjudicator of commoner-

“The myth is that the courts of law administer justice; the truth is that they are the agents of justice. The poor little Indians have been unflinching faith in the judiciary that the fruits of constitutional goals are made available and secured for them. They really rejoiced at many path breaking decisions concerning their fundamental rights. But the recent trends in judiciary caused disquiet in the hearts of the oppressed. “

All the trendy minority decision inevitably generate some basic questions

 

1. Whether the judiciary is obliged to read law in sacred isolation or intertwine legal philosophy with real of life?
2. Whether the concept of social justice is an abstract idealism or a pragmatic constitutional mandate?
3. Whether the DPSP (PART IV) coupled with preambulory promise of “we, the people” permit the revisiting of laissez faire in the field of education at the cost of poorer sections of the society?
4. Whether the judiciary which acknowledged the limitations of Article 37 by reading the DPSP into fundamental rights jurisprudence, is justified in giving primacy to “LIBERALISATION, PRIVATIZATION, GLOBALISATION” doctrine and to support commercialization of education on par with corporate enterprise?
5. If the state withdraws its role in providing higher education to its citizens, what will be its impact on the interests of the disadvantaged sections of the society entitled to constitutional protection?
6. Whether the recent trends indicated through T.M.A.PAI’S case and the other cases which followed it tantamount to judicial progressive thought?
7. Whether the impact of Inamdar’s case strikes at very root of legislative powers of the state in enacting a law for the cause of socially and educationally backward classes and minorities?

It appears that the judicial philosophy with regard to the reservations has become unpredictable and uncertain when it is related to the concept of social justice. Part IV   of the constitution dealing with the Directive Principles of State Policy is not an ideological perception but a pragmatic public command. A right carved out of philosophy of this Part IV is no inferior to the rights in Part III of our constitution, and both these eyes shall look at the perambulatory propositions.

 

Our apex court on many earlier occasions has justified that the constitutional connotation in providing specific provisions relating to reservations is in conformity with requirement of social justice and economic democracy as warranted in the preamble of the Indian constitution. In no case right from Chempakam durai rajan to Unni Krishnan and several other cases the Supreme Court never felt that providing reservations for socially, economically and educationally disadvantaged classes is outmoded or authentic to constitution. The field of education has been jealously guarded by the courts in order to accommodate the interests of the under privileged classes.  Rasco Pound says that justice is the totality of values as to human relations initiatively recognized through collective experience. Justice is a multidimensional and everlasting concept of reality and virtue. It is heartening to note Lord Denning’s enduring observation that “Justice is not something you can see. It is temporal but eternal… it is not the product of his intellect but eternal. The nearest we can get to defining justice is to say that “it what the right minded members of the community – those who have the right spirit within them – believed to be fair”

With all humility it is submitted that the judiciary is the hope and asylum in a country consumed by corrupt power operators and cunning mega builders.

“Ye are the salt of the earth; if the salt have lost his favor, where with shall it be salted” –The Holy Bible

Preparation of Instructional Strategies for Early Childhood Educators in Punjab,Pakistan

INTRODUCTION

 

Early Childhood 

 

Early Childhood is an age, which is denoted differently by different educationists, psychologists, scholars and scientists. To some, it consists of the age three to six (Sahu &Wikipedia) and to some, it spans the human life from birth to age eight (NAEYC). Whatever the duration may be, these are the years, in which all aspects of one’s personality are developed, i.e. physical, mental, emotional, social, linguistic, analytical and creative. Over eighty percent of the human personality, including its attitude and aptitude is shaped before the age of six (Sahu, 2004). Fifty percent of the intelligence measured at age seventeen, is achieved by age four (Bloom).

Early childhood education (ECE)

ECE prepares children for the primary. It lays the foundation for the development of reading, writing and number work. It encourages interaction with the environment, participation in-group activities and enhances creativity and problem solving in children. ECE is a combination of moral, intellectual and social lessons for physical, mental, social, emotional and linguistic growth and development of early childhood age children.

Characteristics of early childhood age children and role of educators

The role of the teacher in ECE is significant, as he is responsible to make the children ready for schooling and providing base for the child’s complete development. Froebel compared the child to a seed and likened the teachers or caregivers to gardeners. The teachers have two functions according to Harlen, i.e. encouraging the child’s curiosity and provide real learning activities. 

1.      At this stage, there is coordination between what the children want to do and what he is able to do. The role of early childhood educators is to encourage each child’s development by accepting their prior experiences. They need to observe constantly the children’s growth patterns and development of the motor skills in them and employ different kinds of plays.
2.      According to Piaget’s description, the children during the age level of 2 to 6 are pre-operational. His approach Social Constructivism emphasizes the active role of the children in constructing their own understanding. According to Vygotsky, the role of the adults in cognitive development of the children is much more important rather the activities of the children chosen by themselves. Early childhood educators should lead children’s learning by giving them chance to learn what they may not be able to learn by themselves.
3.      During these years, the children’s interactions within themselves and with the elders, as well as teachers take on new dimensions. Much of the play is decided through interaction and negotiation. They need to have solitary as well as cooperative play. Many educators emphasize the provision of playing opportunities for social and emotional development of the children. They should be given open ended experiences, choices at mealtimes and flexibility in indoor / outdoor experiences (Arthur et all, 1998). Educators should be aware of the development of the concepts in the children. Individual differences and diversity should be positively handled.
4.      The language is taught from the time the first the child enters the class room in the morning until the last child goes home. The teacher teaches both directly, through activities and experiences and indirectly through her own speech, language and behavior. (Preface, Mathew, 2005).
5.      Much of the understanding of moral values during this age level is based on the notion of fairness. Meaning that what is considered to be fair and good is morally acceptable. Negotiation not only enhances children’s ability to solve problems but also encourages them to adopt the perspectives of others.  

Objectives of Early childhood education

According to Ministry of Education (2006) objectives of early childhood education are, i.e. to develop child potential to learn and grow, provide an appropriate environment ensuring safety, use play way method and concrete experience in teaching and learning, prepare a child for formal schooling and to develop awareness of basic cultural values and norms.

Importance of Early Childhood Education

ECE assists many at risk children in avoiding poor outcomes such as dropping out of the school. Global Monitoring Report on Education For All(2005) reports:

“Good quality ECE not only enhances children’s physical well being, cognitive and language skills, social and emotional development, but also lays the foundations for subsequent education.”

ECE develops in children the love for knowledge, activity and questioning. They are encouraged to do things themselves. They are prepared for the school life. Learning opportunities in early childhood provide benefits by promoting later achievement in school and further life long learning.
Early years are critical in the formation of intelligence, personality, social and physical development. These years lay the foundation of all these aspects, which will persist through the life course. (woodhead, 2006). Early year’s brain development influences the long term cognition, imagination, behaviors and skills of the individuals. (Mustard, 2002). Early childhood has been described as the key investment phase in improving outcomes through out the life course (Hunzai, 2007).

Early childhood education in Pakistan

In Pakistan, Islamic or Quranic education is emphasized from an early age. This education is imparted through three modes i.e., formal, non-formal; and informal either in mosques, madrassahs or at home. Even in the farthest areas, Quranic education is considered to be “compulsory” by tradition and an effective way to inculcate moral values and teach life skills at an early age. It is estimated that more than 80 percent of children in the age group 4-10 years receive Islamic education in this way.

ECE has existed in Pakistan since 1970s in formal primary schools. In public schools, the qualification required for teaching in katchi class is the same as that for primary school i.e., higher secondary education certificate with one-year teaching certificate. In Katchi Classes, a part of the class one curriculum of the National Curriculum is taught. The Teachers Resource Center (TRC) which has developed the national ECE curriculum has been engaged to provide support to teachers’ training and classroom material development and distribution of ‘taleemi bastas’, learning kits for ECE and early primary years.

 A study by Juma(2004) shows that, children were taught in a traditional way with the teacher standing at a blackboard directing the children. Rote memorization was encouraged. In the private sector there were early childhood provisions, which mainly used Montessori approaches fulfilling only to the needs of the elite and the upper-middle class of the society.  It is observed that the teachers do not involve themselves in teaching. Some times, they do not know the principles of growth and development of children. Often, they do not try to attract the children to teaching learning process. They just give lesson to the children and order them to memorize these words without understanding. It is very boring, especially for this age level children, as, this is the age to play with toys, enjoy the company of the peers, imitate the elders and make things themselves.

Private work in ECE is comparatively hopeful with reference to the achievements of the public sector. Children’s Resource International (CRI); the Aga Khan Foundation (AKF); the Teachers’ Resource Centre (TRC) and the College of Home Economics, Lahore have developed various kinds of teaching and learning aids such as blocks, charts, posters, handbooks, flashcards, teachers’ guides; planners; teachers’ kits; etc.

Pakistan is committed to the Dakar Framework of Action, adopted in an international conference on “Education for All”, held in 2000 A.D at Dakar. The first goal was to expand and improve comprehensive early child hood care and education for all children, especially for the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children. Pakistan accepted this challenge and formulated National Plan of Action (NPA) in 2001. Punjab government has also invested in ECE out of its own budget in its Provincial Plan of Action in 2003. The focus is on providing ECE by means of material resources, but the role of teacher in ECE is very much important, and it is being neglected. For the first time, government has contributed separate attention to it in the National Education Policy, 1998-2010 and in 2009 policy as well.

Theories regarding early childhood education

 

The theories already in vogue all over the world for ECE have all the basics to prepare instructional strategies for early childhood education. The most common theories are, Behaviorist orientation (Locke, Skinner etc), Maturations orientation (Rousseau, Freud, etc) and Constructivist orientation (Dewey, Piaget and Montessori). (Dopyera, 1993).The behaviorist orientation works employing principles of reinforcement i.e., positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, non reinforcement, and punishment. Maturation orientation works employing principles of growth and development and Constructivist orientation works keeping cognitive structure of students in concern.

According to Carten &Allen(2003)

“The foundation for all curricula is developmental theory or beliefs about how children develop and learn. These beliefs guide our view of teaching and supporting children as learners”.

Ref: Jack man H.L(2005).

According to Siddiqi, theoretical perspectives for ECE are 1) Maturationist, 2)Learning and 3)Interactionist. Here is an insight into these theories:

Table No:1

 

S.no

Theoretical perspectives

Curriculum objectives

Curriculum content

Instructional techniques

Key concepts

Thinkers of this theory

1

Maturationist

Social, moral and cognitive development. preparation for the present

Determined by the developmental level of the child

Teacher as facilitator, director.

Experimental learning

John dewey

2

Learning

Behavior change. Preparation for the future

Determined by the teacher

Teacher has main role

Operant learning

Skinner

3

Interactionist

Independent thinking and problem solving skills. Preparation for understanding

Determined by the age and developmental level of the child

Teacher as coworker. Prepared environment. Discovery learning

Constructivism

piaget

 

Instructional Strategies

 

Plasma Link Web Services provides the Glossary of Instructional Strategies as a resource for all educators. Current number of strategies and methods is 988 according to this service. (October 19, 2007).

According to Singh and Rana(2004),

“Instructional strategy is some thing that is arranged designed by the teacher to establish interaction between the teacher, the student and the subject matter, or any combination of these three dimensions”

We can say that instructional strategies are the planned sequence of teaching methods. Instructional strategies are an important part of the early childhood Curriculum. The instructional strategies, used for enhancing learning of the children are usually derived from behavioral research. Each strategy is useful for teachers to support children’s early learning and development of all aspects and dimensions. The instructional strategies are the plans and the ways in which the teacher designs his/her teaching. (Singh&Rana: 2004).The strategies are the application of the skills of the teachers in the organization of the teaching learning process.

Principles to prepare instructional strategies for Early Childhood Education

Here are some principles derived from the books i.e. Early Childhood Education Today, by Morrison(1988), Guiding young children, by Verna(1990) and Becoming a teacher of young Children, by Dopyera(1993)etc. The researcher considers them to be helpful in preparation of instructional strategies for early childhood educators:

Activities should be a joyful experience for the children. Activities should be about daily living, so that, they may teach the children their responsibilities. Activities should follow the children’s nature. Activities should be less structured. Activities should have ability to have sensory training. Place every thing before the senses. Activities may not only be able to give training of socialization, but also training of religious and moral instructions. The teacher herself should give direction and guidance, but in in-formal way. Activities must be child centered, language based and cooperative learning based. Teacher must respond to the child questioning. Positive feedback must be provided to the students.  Respect for the child should not be ignored; rather, they should be Involved in motor activities as much as possible and encouraged to act in different activities related to practical life. Use multi-dimensional activities to encourage social inter action between teacher and students. The teacher must observe students during activities, give individualized instruction and emphasize drill and use concrete material as much as possible.  Activities should be reinforcing and meaningful. Physical, mental, motor, language, moral and psychological development of the child should be the first preference while developing the activities. Activities must increase the child’s ability to think, make children do the things themselves free from sexist behavior , should be free choice of activities, There should be combination of indoor and outdoor, quiet and active activities, Sharpen the power of observation of the children. Organize children in small groups. Use neither too hard, nor too easy activities. Put learning material on low shelves. Avoid crowding material. Use variety of methods. Be specific while developing activities. Give clear instructions. Help in assessing the students. Teach intellectual concepts through art activities. Bereiter and Englemann (1966) propose rewarding the child who tries, avoiding shaming and preserving the spirit of group.

Problems faced by early childhood educators

According to Ministry of education, Pakistan,2003,  Shahida Mohiuddin, Hunzai, 2006, Juma, 2004, problems faced by the early childhood educators are lack of proper training both in the public and private sector, lack of resources, i.e. teaching kit, balls, blocks etc, big size of the class, lack of interest and commitment of teachers, lack of proper classroom, lack of cooperation of the society, lack of government support in terms of financial allocation, lack of an agreed amount of social values, domestic problems, contradictory situation at home and school, lack of exemplary personality traits among teachers, no laboratory, no transportation system, the same syllabus for all the children, no knowledge of objectives, new strategies are not encouraged by the head teachers, limited knowledge of using the instructional aids, limited ability to prepare instructional aids themselves, no knowledge of linking instruction with the objectives, limited awareness of the benefits of the ECE among parents and society.

METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY

The study dealt with the improvement of the teaching learning process at pre primary at present, so the researcher used the descriptive method of research. The data was collected from the teachers and the students in the form of questionnaires and observation sheets. These tools were used because of less expensiveness, ease of administration and suitability to the problem.The population of the study consisted of the early childhood educators of the early childhood education institutions in Punjab province. The students learning in these institutions were observed during teaching learning process.  Simple random sampling method was used by selecting samples from private schools and government schools throughout Punjab.Total 66 early childhood educators were selected randomly from three districts of the Punjab, i.e. Bahawalpur, Lodhran and Bahawalnagar.Total 270 children were observed during the teaching learning process. 

FINDINGS

On the basis of analysis and interpretation of the data following findings were made:

  Findings of Questionnaire for Teachers  

Language:

 (87%) of the respondents is of the view that imitation is used to teach language,  (91%) agree that the teachers use verbal instruction.89% agree with the use of questioning strategy. 74% agree with the use of lecture method to teach language. (83%) of early childhood educators agree with providing storybooks to the children. (87%) agree that repeated presentation of the poems is used to teach language. (86%) agree showing films and videos to the children. (78%) agree that, listen, follow instructional strategy in games and  (82%) agree that listen; follow strategy in plays (dramas etc) is also an effective instructional strategy. For learning language, discussion based on pictures is agreed upon by 86% respondents and dramatic play is agreed by (77%)  respondents and (90%) agree that telling stories to the children is an effective instructional strategy for teaching language.                 

Mathematics:

 (88%) of respondents agree for drill method to be used for teaching mathematic concepts. (90%) agree upon problem-solving strategy and (83%) of respondents agree for questioning strategy, (70%) agree that teaching activities regarding mathematics should be integrated with other activities and other activities should also be integrated with mathematic activities. (78%) think that writing should be used as a tool for learning counting. (75%) agree with writing strategy to be used as a tool for learning addition. (79%) agree for Puzzles given to children to solve math problems.70% agree with songs and poems focusing on rote memorization to be used as a tool for learning. (78%) agree with math concepts to be learnt through plays. (92%) agree withblocks to be used as a tool for learning math concepts.

Science: 

89% respondent early childhood educators agree with learning science concepts by experiments.81% agree that exhibitions should be used as a tool for learning science concepts. Carrying out study tours is also an instructional strategy agreed by 82% respondents.74% agree carrying out project based learning as a tool . (86%) agree learning science concepts by group problem solving strategy.81% agree upon use of whole class discussion. (87%) agree for demonstration of science related objects, to be the tool for learning.88% agrees with learning science concepts by the laboratory work. (90%) agree that questioning strategy is used for understanding science concepts. (87%) agree that, Class gardens are made for understanding botany related concepts. 

Social studies: 

 (87%) of respondents agree about field trips to be arranged for the children.  (87%) agree about storybooks to be given to the children. (85%) teachers agree that textbook, having knowledge related to society is given to the children. (86%) agree that, festivals are celebrated inside the school. (90%) agree that, assembly lectures are used as a tool for learning social norms. (91%) agree that the children memorize national songs. (87%) agree thatdramatic plays are held for teaching social and moral values. (91%) agree that classroom discussion is used as a tool for learning.83% respondents agree that the teachers tell historical stories.

Religious education: 

(91%) of the respondents agree that modeling is used as tools for learning religion.87% agree with the statement that the teacher uses verbal instruction for religious education. (89%) agree upon questioning strategy, (84%) agree upon use of lecture method for teaching religious education. (82 %) teachers agree that storybooks are given to the children. (80%) agree that dramatic readings are given to the children. (86%) of the respondents agree that summer reading is given to the children. (94%) of the respondents agree that prayers are memorized. (91 %) agree that Thought for the day is given to the children. (91%) agree that the teacher behaves as a role model. (88%) agree that role-playing is used as a tool for learning religious education.(86%) of respondents agree that assembly lectures are prepared and presented by the teachers.

Creativity

 (82%) of the respondents agree that prepared environment is given to the children. (81%) agree that color it (shapes etc) type activities are given to the children. (79%) agree that the children make things with rods. (86%) agree that the children make things with clay. (77%) agree that doll making is taught to the children. (87%) agree that house making is used as tool for creative thinking of the children. (92%) agree that constructive plays are arranged for the children. (84%) agree that demonstration is used as a tool for creative thinking of the children. (81%) agree that teacher plays his role as a coworker in the creative work of the children. (82%) agree that laboratory work by the children is encouraged. (91%) agree that block building is also used as a tool for creativity enhancement. (94%) agree that solve it (puzzles) type activities are given to the children.

 

Imitation is the most preferred strategy (35%) by the early childhood educators for teaching language, while questioning and lecture method are the second preferences of the educators (23%). Drill method is the most preferred strategy (38%) by the early childhood educators for teaching mathematics, while Puzzles are the second preferences of the educators (23%). Experiment, exhibitions and study tours are the most preferred strategy (30%) by the early childhood educators for teaching science. Assembly lectures are the most preferred strategy (38%) by the early childhood educators for teaching social studies while, field trips and dramatic plays are the second preference (23%) each. Modeling is the most preferred strategy (45%), while, by the early childhood educators for teaching religious education Verbal instruction is the second one(24%) and Questioning strategy the third preference (15%). Constructive play is the most preferred strategy (38%) by the early childhood educators for teaching creativity. while, Demonstration is the second one (32%) and Teacher as coworker the third preference (23%). Almost 61% educators say that there is no guide available to them. The most common deficiency is training (45%) given to the educators ,big classes (26%), less time(20%),pay scale (24%) are the responses of the educators. 

Findings of observation sheet for the children

Almost 44% children were involved in learning. Almost 56% children were enjoying learning. Almost for 22%children, activities were being done for physical health when observed during their learning time. To almost 77% children, positive reinforcement was being used for their learning.  Almost 78 % children were not learning habits of cleanliness and health. All the five senses of almost only 11%children were being trained to learn. Almost 67% techniques employed by the educators did not ensure safety. Almost only 22% children were getting instruction by more than one method of teaching Almost 67% activities were focusing on the growth patterns of the children. There was freedom for almost only 33% children to choose one activity or the other. Almost only 44% classroom atmosphere was free of any tension and weather intensity. Almost 56% children were encouraged to be silent in the class, 44% children seemed fully involved in learning with both the mind and the body. Almost only 44%children were engaged in activities like drama, simulation etc. 44% children were provided with facilities like play apparatus, sand play, water play and gardening. Almost 67% children seemed having emotional touch with the educator. The things being taught to the children were shown to 44% children.  44%children were learning the concept of colors with the help of the things of those colors, i. e. blocks, garments and balls. Almost 89% children were learning the concept of seriating with concrete things. 44% children were learning the concept of shapes by tracing, cutting and pasting. Almost 56% children were learning the concept of opposites through different objects available in the class. 33% children were learning the names of the foods at the snack time. Almost 56% children were learning counting with the help of the things around instead of rot memorization.  44% children were learning science concepts through observation and experiments. Almost 56% children were learning to follow the rules. Almost 67% children were learning school habits. Only 33%children were learning reading skills by play way method. Only 33% children were learning writing skills by play way method. Almost only 33% children were learning speaking skills by play way method. 44% children were learning listening skills by play way method. Almost 89% children were learning to follow the routines in daily life. Almost 56% children were learning cultural values through stories told by the educator. Almost 56% children were learning cooperation with others through play activities. 44% of children were able to understand social norms by the help of conversation. 44%children were learning civic responsibilities and other manners inside and outside the class. Almost only 11%children had opportunities to read storybooks having moral and social lessons Almost 45% children were learning love for country and nation through dramas, stories and games.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no guide available for the early childhood educators. 61% educators say that there is no guide available to them. It shows that there is need for a teacher’s guide for this level. The most common deficiency is training given to the      educators ,big classes ,less time, pay scale are the other responses of the educators. So, these are the problems, which should be solved as soon as possible.
Majority of respondents agree that instructional strategies for teaching languages can be imitation, verbal instruction, use of questioning strategy, use of lecture method, providing storybooks to the children, repeated presentation of the poems, showing films and videos to the children, listen, follow instructional strategy in games and in plays (dramas etc), discussion based on pictures, strategy of using dramatic play and telling stories to the children. 
Majority of respondents agree that instructional strategies for teaching mathematics can be drill method, problem-solving strategy, questioning strategy, teaching activities regarding mathematics integrated with other activities and other activities integrated with mathematic activities, writing used as a tool for learning counting and addition, Puzzles to solve math problems, songs and poems focusing on rote memorization, math concepts to be learnt through plays and use ofblocks.  
Majority of respondents agree that instructional strategies for teaching science can be learning science concepts by experiments, exhibitions, Carrying out study tours, project based learning, group problem solving strategy, whole class discussion, demonstration of science related objects, laboratory work, questioning strategy and class gardens made for understanding botany related concepts. 
Majority of respondents agree that instructional strategies for teaching social studies can be field trips, storybooks and textbook, having knowledge related to society, given to the children, celebrating festivals, assembly lectures, memorizing national songs, dramatic plays, classroom discussion, telling historical stories to children.
Majority of respondents agree that instructional strategies for teaching religious education can be modeling, verbal instruction, questioning strategy, lecture method, storybooks and dramatic readings, given to the children, summer reading, memorizing prayers, Thought for the day given to the children, teachers behave as  role models, role-playing and assembly lectures related to religious education.
Majority of respondents agree that instructional strategies for teaching and developing creativity can be prepared environment, color it (shapes etc) type activities, children make things with rods and clay, doll making, house making, constructive plays, demonstration, teacher plays his role as coworker in the creative work, laboratory work, block building  and solve it (puzzles) type activities.
It is concluded that some instructional strategies can be used for multi purpose teaching, as modeling can be used for teaching language and religious education, demonstration can be used for teaching science concepts, and developing creativity, questioning strategy can be used for teaching language, mathematics, science and religious education, discussion can be used for teaching language, social studies and science, providing storybooks can be used to teach language, social studies and religious education, verbal instruction can be used to teach language and religious education, dramatic plays can be used to teach language and social studies, memorizing can be used to teach mathematics, social studies and religious education, assembly lectures can be used to teach social and religious education, laboratory work can be used to teach science and creativity, tours and trips can be used to teach science and social studies, and finally,  puzzles and blocks can also be used to teach mathematics and creativity.

          RECOMMENDATIONS

The researcher does following recommendations, after intensive study of the phenomena.

1. The following Instructional strategies should be used for teaching any language:

 

Imitation,
Verbal instruction,
Questioning strategy,
Lecture method
Providing storybooks
Repeated presentation of the poems
Showing films and videos
Listen, follow instructional strategy in games
Listen; follow strategy in plays (dramas etc)
Discussion based on pictures
Dramatic play
Telling stories

 

2. The following Instructional strategies should be used for teaching mathematics

 

Drill method
Problem-solving strategy
Questioning strategy
A activities regarding mathematics, integrated with other activities
Writing, as a tool for learning counting
Writing, as a tool for learning addition
Puzzles
Songs and poems focusing on rote memorization
Plays
Blocks

 

3. The following Instructional strategies should be used for teaching science

 

Experiments
Exhibitions
Study tours
Project based learning
Group problem solving
Whole class discussion
Demonstration
Laboratory work
Questioning
Class gardens

 

4. The following Instructional strategies should be used for teaching social studies

 

Field trips
Storybooks
Textbook, having knowledge related to society
Celebrating festivals
Assembly lectures
Memorize national songs
Dramatic plays
Classroom discussion
Tell historical stories.

 

5. The following Instructional strategies should be used for teaching religious education

 

Modeling
Verbal instruction
Questioning strategy
Lecture method
Storybooks
Dramatic readings
Summer reading
Memorize prayers
Thought for the day
Teacher as a role model
Role-playing
Assembly lectures

 

6. The following Instructional strategies should be used for teaching and developing creativity

 

Prepared environment
Color it (shapes etc) type activities
Making things with rods
Making things with clay
Doll making
House making
Constructive plays
Demonstration
Teacher as coworker
Laboratory work
Block building
Solve it (puzzles) type activities

 

The resources are not more important than the teacher’s creativity. Teachers should use their own creativity and imagination during teaching. They should not be contented with the teaching learning material available to them. Rather, they should try to make material themselves as well. The educators at early childhood education institute should be given special training. The teachers should be given a teaching guide, which will surely be helpful for them to teach.
The future researchers can work on the effectiveness of using these recommended instructional strategies on child’s learning. Future work can also be done on identifying more effective instructional strategies for early childhood educators. The future researchers can work on instructional strategies for primary, secondary, graduate and post graduate level teachers.

Special Education, Public School Law & Educational Laws and Policies, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis

 

William Alan Kritsonis, PhD

Professor

 

Public School Law & Educational Laws and Policies

 

 

 

 

FAPE

 

                                               

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is the law that provides your child with the right to a free, appropriate public education (FAPE). The purpose of the IDEA is “to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepare them for further education, employment, and independent living…” 20 U.S.C. 1400(d) (Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition, page 20). The Board of Education v. Rowley case is significant because it established the principle that school districts are not required to maximize the potential of a child but provide some educational benefit to the child and how courts would examine future disputes under IDEA (Walsh, Kemerer, and Maniotis, 2005). 

 

 

 

Case One

 

United States Supreme Court

 

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE HENDRICK HUDSON CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, WESTCHESTER COUNTY,

v.

AMY ROWLEY, by her parents, ROWLEY et al.

No. 80 – 1002

 

LITIGANTS

 

Plaintiffs – Petitioners: Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District, Westchester County, et al.

 

Defendant – Respondent: Amy Rowley, by her parents, Rowley, et., al.

 

BACKGROUND

 

The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (IDEA), provides federal money to assist state and local agencies in educating handicapped children, and federally fund States in compliance with extensive goals and procedures. The Act represents an ambitious federal effort to promote the education of handicapped children, and was passed in response to Congress’ perception that a majority of handicapped in the United States “were either totally excluded from schools or [were] sitting idly in regular classrooms awaiting the time when they were old enough to ‘drop out.’” The Acts evolution and major provisions shed light on the question of statutory interpretation which is at the heart of this case.

                                                                                               

Congress first addressed the problem of education the handicapped in 1966 when it amended the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to establish a grant program “for the purpose of assisting the States in the initiation, expansion, and improvement of programs and projects for the education of handicapped children. That program was repealed in 1970 by the Education for the Handicapped Act, Pub. L. No. 91-230, 84 Star, 175, Part B of which established a grant program similar in purpose to the repealed legislation. Neither the 1966 nor 1970 legislation contained specific guidelines for state use of the grant money; both were aimed primarily at stimulating the States to develop educational resources and to train personnel for educating the handicapped.

Dissatisfied with the progress being made under these earlier enactments, and spurred by two district court decisions holding that handicapped children should be given access to a public education, Congress in 1974 greatly increased federal funding for education of the handicapped and for the first time required recipient States to adopt “a goal of providing full educational opportunities to all handicapped children.” Pub. L. 93-380, 88 Stat. 579, 583 (1974) (the 1974 statue). The 1974 statute was recognized as an interim measure only, adopted “in order to give the Congress an additional year in which to study what if any additional Federal assistance [was] required to enable the States to meet the needs of handicapped children.” H.R. Rep. No. 94-332, supra, p.4. The ensuing year of study produced the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975.

 

In order to qualify for federal financial assistance under the Act, a State must demonstrate that it “has in effect a policy that assures all handicapped children the right to a free appropriate public education.” 20 U.S.C. 1412(1). The “free appropriate public education” required by the Act is tailored to the unique needs of the handicapped child by means of an ‘individualized educational program” (IEP). In addition to the state plan and the IEP already described, the Act imposes extensive procedural requirements upon State receiving federal funds under its provisions. Parents or guardians of handicapped children must be notified of any proposed change in “the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of the child or the provision of a free appropriate public education to the child,” and must be permitted to being a complaint about “any matter relating to” such evaluation and education. 1415(b)(1)(D) and (E).6 Complaints brought by parents or guardians must be resolved at “an impartial due process hearing,” and appeal to the State educational agency must be provided if the initial hearing is held at the local or regional level. Thus, although the Act leaves to the States the primary responsibility for developing and executing educational programs for handicapped children, it imposes significant requirements to be followed in the discharge of that responsibility. Compliance is assured by provisions permitting the withholding of federal funds upon determination that a participating state or local agency has failed to satisfy the requirements of the Act, 1414(b)(A), 1416, and by the provision for judicial review. At present, all States except New Mexico receive federal funds under the portions of the Act at issue today.

FACTS

                                                                                   

Amy Rowley is a deaf student in New York.  Amy has minimal residual hearing and is an excellent lipreader.  During the year before she started attending Furnace Woods School, Amy’s parents and school administrators met and decided to place her in a regular kindergarten classroom to determine what supplemental services would be necessary to her education.  Several members of the administration took a course in sign-language interpretation, and a teletype machine was installed in the principal’s office to facilitate communication with her parents who are also deaf.  After Amy was placed temporarily in the regular classroom, it was determined that she should stay in that class, but be provided with an FM hearing aid to amplify words.  Amy successfully finished her kindergarten year.

 

Before Amy entered first grade, an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) was prepared, which provided that Amy should continue to receive her education in the regular classroom and use the FM hearing aid, she should also receive instruction from a tutor for the deaf for one hour each day and from a speech therapist for three hours each week.  The Rowleys agreed with parts of this plan, but insisted that Amy also be provided a qualified sign-language interpreter in all of her academic classes instead of the assistance proposed in other parts of the IEP.

 

An interpreter had been placed in Amy’s kindergarten class for a 2-week experimental period, but the interpreter had reported that Amy did not need his services at that time.  The same conclusion was reached by the school for Amy’s first grade year.  An independent examiner also agreed with the administrators’ determination that an interpreter was not necessary because Amy was achieving educationally, academically, and socially without such assistance.  Amy performs better than the average child in her class and is advancing easily from grade to grade.  However, she understands less of what goes on in the class than she could if she were not deaf and so she is not learning as much, or performing as well academically, as she would without her handicap.

 

DECISION

 

The Court stated that a “free appropriate public education” is one which consists of educational instruction specially designed to meet the unique needs of the handicapped child, supported by such services as are necessary to permit the child “to benefit” from the instruction.  If personalized instruction is being provided with sufficient supportive services to allow the child to benefit from the instruction, and the other items on the definitional checklist are satisfied, the child is receiving a “free public education.”  Absent in the statute is any substantive standard prescribing the level of education to be accorded handicapped children.

 

“By passing the Act, Congress sought primarily to make public education available to handicapped children.  But in seeking to provide such access to public education, Congress did not impose upon the States any greater substantive educational standard than would be necessary to make such access meaningful.”  Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 at 192.  The Court says the intent of the act was more to open the

                                                                                                Higgins, Green, Reece

 

door of pubic education than to guarantee the level of education once inside.  The Court further states that whatever Congress meant by an “appropriate” education, it did not mean a potential-maximizing education.  It did not mean the State had to provide specialized services to maximize each child’s potential “commensurate with the opportunity provided other children.”  The basic floor of opportunity provided by the Act is access to specialized instruction and related services which are individually designed to provide educational benefit to the handicapped child.

 

DICTA

 

Implicit in the congressional purpose of providing access to a “free appropriate public education” is the requirement that the education to which access is provided be sufficient to confer some educational benefit upon the handicapped child. It would do little good for Congress to spend millions of dollars in providing access to public education only to have the handicapped child receive no benefit from that education. The statutory definition of “free appropriate public education,” in addition to requiring that States provide each child with “specially designed instruction,” expressly requires the provision of “such . . . supportive services . . . as may be required to assist a handicapped child to benefit from special education.” 1401(17) (emphasis added). We therefore conclude that the “basic floor of opportunity” provided by the Act consists of access to specialized instruction and related services which are individually designed to provide educational benefit to the handicapped child.

 

IMPLICATIONS

 

The determination of when handicapped children are receiving sufficient educational benefits to satisfy the requirements of the Act presents a more difficult problem. The Act requires participating States to educate a wide spectrum of handicapped children, from the marginally hearing-impaired to the profoundly retarded palsied. It is clear that the benefits obtainable by children at one end of the spectrum will differ dramatically form those obtainable by children at the other end, with infinite variations in between. One child may have little difficulty competing successfully in an academic setting with nonhandicapped children while another child may encounter great difficulty in acquiring even the most basic of self-maintenance skills. We do not attempt today to establish any one test for determining the adequacy of educational benefits conferred upon all children covered by the Act. Because in this case we are presented with a handicapped child who is receiving substantial specialized instruction and related services, and who is performing above average in the regular classrooms of a public school system, we confine our analysis to the situation.

 

 

 

 

PUBLICE SCHOOL LAW

 

William Allan Kritsonis, PhD

 

                                               

 

LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT

 

INTRODUCTION

 

An important provision of Public Law 94-142 (IDEA) is that all handicapped students be educated in the least restrictive environment (LRE) (Heron & Skinner, 1981).  Federal law expresses a strong preference for placing the child with disabilities in the setting in which that child would be served if there were no disability (Walsh, Kemerer, and Maniotis, 2005). However, these requirements continue to generate complex and interesting questions from the field. In particular, this report focuses on questions that have been raised about the relationship of IDEA’s LRE requirements to “inclusion.”  If the goal of IDEA is to mainstream students with disabilities, despite efforts made from administrators, specialists, and staff, how can this be achievable if the child has not made academic progress in the regular classroom? 

 

 

Case One

 

United States Court of Appeals,

Fourth Circuit.

950 F.2d. 156

18 IDELR 350

 

Shannon CARTER, a minor, by and through her father, and next friend, Emory D. Carter, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellee,

v.

FLORENCE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUR: Ernest K. NICHOLSON, Superintendent, in his official capacity; SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS; Bennie ANDERSON, Chairman; Monroe FRIDAY, Jack ODOM; Elrita BACOTE; T.R. GREEN; James W. HICKS, in their official capacity

No. 91 – 1047

 

LITIGANTS

 

Plaintiffs – Appellees:    Mark Hartmann, et al.

 

Defendant – Appellant: Florence County School District Four, et., al.

 

BACKGROUND

 

Mark Hartmann is an eleven year old child with autism.  Autism is a developmental disorder characterized by significant deficiencies in communication skills, social interaction, and motor control.  Mark is not able to speak and has severed problems with fine motor coordination.  Mark’s ability to write is limited.  He types on a keyboard but can only consistently type a few words such as “is” and “at”.  Mark has had episodes of

                                                                       

 

Loud screeching and other disruptive conduct; including, hitting, pinching, kicking, biting, and removing his clothing.  The school district proposed removing Mark from the regular classroom and place him in a class structured for children with autism.  However, he would be integrated for art, music, physical education, library, and recess.  Mark would be allowed to rejoin the regular education setting as he demonstrated an improved ability to handle it.  The Hartmanns refused to approve the IEP, claiming that it failed to comply with the mainstreaming provision of the IDEA, which states that “to the maximum extent appropriate,” disabled children should be educated with children who are not handicapped. 20 U.S.C. § 1412(5)(B). The county initiated due process proceedings, 20 U.S.C. § 1415(b), and on December 14, 1994, the local hearing officer upheld the May 1994 IEP. She found that Mark’s behavior was disruptive and that despite the “enthusiastic” efforts of the county, he had obtained no academic benefit from the regular education classroom. On May 3, 1995, the state review officer affirmed the decision, adopting both the hearing officer’s findings and her legal analysis. The Hartmanns then challenged the hearing officer’s decision in federal court.

While the administrative process continued, Mark entered third grade in the regular education classroom at Ashburn. In December of that year, the Hartmanns withdrew Mark from Ashburn. Mark and his mother moved to Montgomery County, Virginia, to permit the Hartmanns to enroll Mark in public school there. Mark was placed in the regular third-grade classroom for the remainder of that year as well as the next.

The district court reversed the hearing officer’s decision. The court rejected the administrative findings and concluded that Mark could receive significant educational benefit in a regular classroom and that “the Board simply did not take enough appropriate steps to try to include Mark in a regular class.” The court made little of the testimony of Mark’s Loudoun County instructors, and instead relied heavily on its reading of Mark’s experience in Illinois and Montgomery County. While the hearing officer had addressed Mark’s conduct in detail, the court stated that “given the strong presumption for inclusion under the IDEA, disruptive behavior should not be a significant factor in determining the appropriate educational placement for a disabled child.”

 

FACTS

 

Mark spent his pre-school years in various programs for disabled children. In kindergarten, he spent half his time in a self-contained program for autistic children and half in a regular education classroom at Butterfield Elementary in Lombard, Illinois. Upon entering first grade, Mark received speech and occupational therapy one-on-one, but was otherwise included in the regular classroom at Butterfield full-time with an aide to assist him.

After Mark’s first-grade year, the Hartmanns moved to Loudoun County, Virginia, where they enrolled Mark at Ashburn Elementary for the 1993-1994 school year. Based on Mark’s individualized education program (IEP) from Illinois, the school placed Mark in a regular education classroom. To facilitate Mark’s inclusion, Loudoun officials carefully selected his teacher, hired a full-time aide to assist him, and put him in a smaller class with more independent children. Mark’s teacher, Diane Johnson, read extensively about

                                                                                   

 

autism, and both Johnson and Mark’s aide, Suz Leitner, received training in facilitated communication, a special communication technique used with autistic children. Mark received five hours per week of speech and language therapy with a qualified specialist,   Carolyn Clement. Halfway through the year, Virginia McCullough, a special education teacher, was assigned to provide Mark with three hours of instruction a week and to advise Mark’s teacher and aide.

Mary Kearney, the Loudoun County Director of Special Education, personally worked with Mark’s IEP team, which consisted of Johnson, Leitner, Clement, and Laurie McDonald, the principal of Ashburn. Kearney provided in-service training for the Ashburn staff on autism and inclusion of disabled children in the regular classroom. Johnson, Leitner, Clement, and McDonald also attended a seminar on inclusion held by the Virginia Council for Administrators of Special Education. Mark’s IEP team also received assistance from educational consultants Jamie Ruppmann and Gail Mayfield, and Johnson conferred with additional specialists whose names were provided to her by the Hartmanns and the school. Mark’s curriculum was continually modified to ensure that it was properly adapted to his needs and abilities.

Frank Johnson, supervisor of the county’s program for autistic children, formally joined the IEP team in January, but provided assistance throughout the year in managing Mark’s behavior. Mark engaged in daily episodes of loud screeching and other disruptive conduct such as hitting, pinching, kicking, biting, and removing his clothing. These outbursts not only required Diane Johnson and Leitner to calm Mark and redirect him, but also consumed the additional time necessary to get the rest of the children back on task after the distraction.

Despite these efforts, by the end of the year Mark’s IEP team concluded that he was making no academic progress in the regular classroom. In Mark’s May 1994 IEP, the team therefore proposed to place Mark in a class specifically structured for autistic children at Leesburg Elementary. Leesburg is a regular elementary school which houses the autism class in order to facilitate interaction between the autistic children and students who are not handicapped. The Leesburg class would have included five autistic students working with a special education teacher and at least one full-time aide. Under the May IEP, Mark would have received only academic instruction and speech in the self-contained classroom, while joining a regular class for art, music, physical education, library, and recess. The Leesburg program also would have permitted Mark to increase the portion of his instruction received in a regular education setting as he demonstrated an improved ability to handle it.

 

DECISION

 

To demand more than this from regular education personnel would essentially require them to become special education teachers trained in the full panoply of disabilities that their students might have. Virginia law does not require this, nor does the IDEA. First, such a requirement would fall afoul of Rowley’s admonition that the IDEA does not guarantee the ideal educational opportunity for every disabled child. Furthermore, when the IDEA was passed, Congress’ intention was not that the Act displace the primacy of

                                                                                   

 

States in the field of education, but that States receive funds to assist them in extending their educational systems to the handicapped.” Rowley, 458 U.S. at 208. The IDEA “expressly incorporates State educational standards.” Schimmel v. Spillane, 819 F.2d 477, 484 (4th Cir. 1987). We can think of few steps that would do more to usurp state educational standards and policy than to have federal courts re-write state teaching certification requirements in the guise of applying the IDEA.  In sum, we conclude that Loudoun County’s efforts on behalf of Mark were sufficient to satisfy the IDEA’s mainstreaming directive.

 

DICTA

 

The IDEA embodies important principles governing the relationship between local school authorities and a reviewing district court. Although section 1415(e)(2) provides district courts with authority to grant “appropriate” relief based on a preponderance of the evidence, 20 U.S.C. § 1415(e)(2), that section “is by no means an invitation to the courts to substitute their own notions of sound educational policy for those of the school authorities which they review.” Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central Sch. Dist. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 206 (1982).  These principles reflect the IDEA’s recognition that federal courts cannot run local schools. Local educators deserve latitude in determining the individualized education program most appropriate for a disabled child. The IDEA does not deprive these educators of the right to apply their professional judgment. Rather it establishes a “basic floor of opportunity” for every handicapped child. Rowley, 458 U.S. at 201. States must provide specialized instruction and related services “sufficient to confer some educational benefit upon the handicapped child,” id. at 200, but the Act does not require “the furnishing of every special service necessary to maximize each handicapped child’s potential,” id. at 199.

 

IMPLICATIONS

 

The IDEA encourages mainstreaming, but only to the extent that it does not prevent a child from receiving educational benefit. The evidence in this case demonstrates that Mark Hartmann was not making academic progress in a regular education classroom despite the provision of adequate supplementary aids and services. Loudoun County properly proposed to place Mark in a partially mainstreamed program which would have addressed the academic deficiencies of his full inclusion program while permitting him to interact with nonhandicapped students to the greatest extent possible. This professional judgment by local educators was deserving of respect. The approval of this educational approach by the local and state administrative officers likewise deserved a deference from the district court which it failed to receive. In rejecting reasonable pedagogical choices and disregarding well-supported administrative findings, the district court assumed an educational mantle which the IDEA did not confer. Accordingly, the judgment must be reversed, and the case remanded with directions to dismiss it.

 

 

 

 

William Allan Kritsonis, PhD

 

 

SPECIAL EDUCATION

 

 

SPECIAL EDUCATION

 

INTRODUCTION

 

“Appropriate” education is one that goes beyond the normal school year. If a child will experience severe or substantial regression during the summer months in the absence of a summer program, the handicapped child may be entitled to year round services. The Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA) passed in 1975, this act provided support to state special education programs to provide free appropriate public education to disabled children. National precedent establishing the tests for determining the need for an extended school year for special needs children.

            For the purpose of this case we will determine if there is sufficient enough evidence of regression to justify requiring the district to provide summer services to the student.

Case One

 

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit

 

 

Alamo Heights Independent School District-Plaintiff-Appellants

v.

State Board Of Education, et al., Defendants-Apelles

790 F .d 1153

 

 

LITIGANTS

Plaintiff –Appellant: Alamo Heights Independent School District

 

Defendants – Apelles: State Board of Education

 

Background

 

In the summer  1979, when Steven was seven, his mother moved into the Alamo Heights Independent School District. That school year Steven attended a special education program at Cambridge Elementary School. In the late spring of 1980, Mrs. G.

 

requested that the Alamo Heights Independent School District provide summer services for Steven.

For seven years prior to 1980 the Alamo Heights School District had offered a summer program to all special education students who were moderately or severely handicapped. The decision to offer the program was made on the administrative level, as a matter of district policy, and any moderate to severely handicapped child was eligible to

 

attend. In the summer of 1980, when Steven would have been eligible for this program, however, the School District changed its policy and offered only a half-day one-month program, without providing transportation. The decision to curtail the summer program was based on its cost and the apparent lack of interest on the part of teachers and eligible students in previous years.

No students from Steven’s multiply handicapped class took advantage of the 1980 summer program, nor did Steven. It is not clear, however, whether Mrs. G. was not told of the program or whether the lack of transportation and the hours made it impossible for Steven to attend. During that summer, Steven stayed with a baby-sitter who had no training in special education. There was testimony that Steven’s behavior deteriorated that summer and that he suffered regression in his ability to stand, point, and feed himself.

The next year Mrs. G.’s request for summer services and transportation was refused by school officials, without consultation with Steven’s Admission, Review and Dismissal (ARD) Committee or with his teacher. The only caretaker Mrs. G. could find for Steven lived a mile outside of the district boundary, and even during the school year, the School District would not provide out-of-district transportation.

Mrs. G. then employed legal counsel and appealed the denial of services to the Texas Education Agency. The administrative hearing officer issued an interim order requesting a meeting of Steven’s ARD Committee to consider the issue of summer services. The ARD Committee met and agreed only to provide some adaptive equipment for Steven and to request consultative services from the state during the summer of 1981. On August 21, 1981, the hearing officer issued a “proposal for decision” in which he found that the School District was required to provide summer services and related

transportation services during 1981, and also required the School District to make a decision regarding summer services for 1982 by March of 1982.

Facts

 

Without some kind of continuous, structured educational program during the evidence to conclude that Steven G. would definitely suffer severe regression after a summer without such a program, neither can it conclude that he would not and there is evidence that shows that Steven G. has suffered more than the loss of skills in isolated instances, and that he has required recoupment time of more than several weeks after summers without continuous, structured programming. A summer without continuous, structured programming would result in substantial regression of knowledge gained and skills learned, and, given the severity of Steven G.’s handicaps, this regression would be significant.

Decision

 

Mrs. G.’s efforts to obtain the appropriate provision of free educational services for her son were pursued within the administrative framework set up by the State of Texas pursuant to EAHCA guidelines. The success she achieved in requiring the School District to provide Steven with an appropriate individualized educational placement, including summer services, was obtained through and within the “elaborate, precisely

defined administrative and judicial enforcement system. Because we find that, whether or  denominated due process, the claims upon which Mrs. G. has prevailed are rights granted by the EAHCA, and because the EAHCA contains no provision for attorney’s fees, we agree with the district court that no attorney’s fees are to be awarded under Sec. 1988.

We also find that Mrs. G. is not entitled to attorney’s fees under the Rehabilitation Act. In Smith, the Court stated, “Of course, if a State provided services beyond those required by the [EAHCA], but discriminatorily denied those services to a handicapped child, Section 504 [of the Rehabilitation Act] would remain available as an avenue of relief.”

Mrs. G. asserts that the fact that the School District provided a summer remedial reading program, free of charge, to nonhandicapped children without providing an

analogous free summer program to handicapped children is a clear instance of discrimination on the basis of handicap in violation of Sec. 504.

 We do not agree. Under the EAHCA, the School District is required to provide handicapped children with a free, appropriate education geared towards their individual needs. If a handicapped child’s IEP requires summer services under the EAHCA, he is entitled to summer services. The fact that the School District affords some nonhandicapped children remedial help during the summer does not mean that it is required to offer similar remedial summer guidance to handicapped children, irrespective of whether their individual IEP’s provide for structured summer services. The school district’s action in Steven’s case has not been shown to constitute discrimination on the basis of his handicap distinct from the protection afforded under the EAHCA. Hence, Mrs. G. is not entitled to attorney’s fees under 29 U.S.C. Sec. 794a(b), the attorney’s fees provision of the Rehabilitation Act.

Finally, the School District argues that it was denied due process by the procedures employed by the State Board of Education during the administrative stage of this action. It contends that under Helms v. McDaniel, the hearing officer’s initial proposed decision of August 24, 1981 should have been considered the final decision of the case and that the hearing officer’s later adoption of the Commissioner of Education’s decision was a direct violation of Helms. It contends that the failure of the hearing officer to adopt his initial proposed decision as the final decision of the case denied them due process. The School District does not favor us with any authority for the proposition that an adjudicative officer is prohibited by the due process clause from changing his opinion in the course of an orderly procedure. We find the district court did not err in dismissing the School District’s due process claims against the state defendants.

 

Dicta

 

The district court carefully phrased its conclusion and, while it did not explicitly state that the educational program offered by the School District did not meet the “some

 

educational benefit” standard of Rowley, the district court showed that it was aware of that decision and its judgment is therefore tantamount to such a conclusion. Hence, we

 

hold that the district court applied the appropriate standard to the factual determinations supported by the record. The general injunctive relief granted by the court was

appropriate to ensure that Steven receives the summer programming to which he is entitled under the Act.

With respect to out-of-district transportation for Steven G., the district court found that transportation is included in the definition of “related service” under 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1401(a)(17) and that such transportation does not cease to be a related service simply because a parent requests transportation to a site a short distance beyond the district boundaries.

Implications

 

The evidence indicates that Todd was receiving benefit from the TISD special education program, and hence, the TISD special education program was an appropriate placement under IDEA. Equally important, the TISD special education program provided Todd with an opportunity to interact with nondisabled peers, and was a less restrictive environment than The Oaks. Thus, regardless of whether Todd extracted any academic benefit from the educational program at The Oaks, Todd’s parents’ unilateral decision to place him there remains their financial responsibility. For these reasons, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 

 

 

 

 

SPECIAL EDUCATION

 

 

Professor William Allan Kritsonis, PhD Program in Educational Leadership, PVAMU, The Texas A&M University System

 

 

SPECIAL EDUCATION

 

INTRODUCTION

 

In order to assure that all children are given a meaningful opportunity to

benefit from public education, the education of children with disabilities is

required to be tailored to the unique needs of the handicapped child by means of an individualized education plan (IEP). As a condition of federal funding, IDEA requires states to provide all children with a “free appropriate public education,” with the statutory term “appropriate” designating education from which the schoolchild obtains some degree of benefit.

            This report focuses on parents rights to place their son in a unilateral placement despite the public school program and IEP. The parents by law have the right to request reimbursement for private placement.

 

Case One

 

United States Courts of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit

 

TODD L., Mr. and Mrs. L., Defendant-Appellants,

v.
TEAGUE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Plaintiff-Appellee,

Docket No. No. 92-8427.

 

LITIGANTS

 

Plaintiffs-Appellant: Todd L., Mr. and Mrs. L., et.al

 

Defendant-Appellee: TEAGUE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

As a condition of federal funding, IDEA requires states to provide all children with a “free appropriate public education,” with the statutory term “appropriate” designating education from which the schoolchild obtains some degree of benefit. IDEA requires that children with disabilities be educated to the maximum extent possible with nondisabled children in the least restrictive environment consistent with their needs, a concept referred to as “mainstreaming.” In order to assure that all children are given a meaningful opportunity to benefit from public education, the education of children with disabilities is required to be tailored to the unique needs of the handicapped child by means of an individualized education plan (IEP).

Complying with IDEA, Todd’s local public school district (the Teague Independent School District, “TISD”), in collaboration with Todd and his parents, developed an IEP for Todd. Consistent with IDEA’s requirement that special education services be tailored to the unique needs of the child, the IEP emphasized one-on-one instruction in specially equipped classrooms, and reduced the length of Todd’s school day from seven hours to two hours. Todd’s school day was reduced not for the convenience of school staff, but in response to Todd’s inability to tolerate a longer school day without becoming unduly frustrated and discouraged, leading to regression rather than academic progress.

The school psychologist specifically found that a shortened school day would be necessary, at least temporarily, to assure that Todd’s inability to tolerate frustration did not lead to his giving up on academics altogether and dropping out of school. Though Todd was educated separately from his nondisabled peers for part of the school day, the school arranged for Todd to have contact with nondisabled peers. The goal of Todd’s four-year IEP was to provide him with a nonthreatening environment in which he could continue to make academic progress while gradually learning to tolerate a lengthened school day and increased stress. The record indicates that the authors of Todd’s IEP fully expected that ultimately Todd would be reintegrated into “the mainstream” of regular classes at the TISD school, and would graduate.

 

Facts

 

             When Todd’s parents sought reimbursement for the costs of Todd’s institutionalization, the TISD refused on the grounds that Todd had been able to benefit from the TISD program and that The Oaks placement was more restrictive than necessary to provide Todd with educational benefit. Todd’s parents appealed to a special education

hearing officer, who found that Todd’s parents should be reimbursed. The special education hearing officer found that Todd’s parents had established that Todd’s local

public school was an inappropriate placement while The Oaks was an appropriate placement. According to the hearing officer, there was no evidence that Todd had obtained any benefit from special education at the TISD School. Contending that this factual conclusion was clearly erroneous, and that the hearing officer did not take into account the relative restrictiveness of The Oaks and the TISD School’s special education program, the school district appealed the hearing officer’s decision to federal district court.

            Although the district court indicated that it gave “due weight” to the decision of the hearing officer, the district court concluded, after reviewing all the evidence from the administrative proceeding and hearing additional evidence, that the TISD public school placement was appropriate, and that The Oaks placement was inappropriate. Therefore, the district court reversed the hearing officer’s decision to grant Todd’s parents reimbursement for the cost of Todd’s institutionalization at The Oaks. Todd’s parents appeal the district court’s decision. We affirm.

Decision

          Having decided that the district court did not err in subjecting the hearing officer’s decision to a searching review, it remains only to decide whether the conclusions drawn by the district court were proper. We review de novo, as a mixed question of law and fact, the district court’s decision that the local school’s IEP was appropriate and that the alternative placement was inappropriate under IDEA. Christopher M. v. Corpus Christi Independent Sch. Dist., 933 F.2d 1285, 1289 (5th Cir.1991). We review the district court’s findings of “underlying fact” for clear error. Id. See also Sherri A.D., 975 F.2d at 207. Findings of “underlying fact” include findings that the schoolchild obtained

any benefit from special education services or would be threatened by a longer school day. Christopher M., 933 F.2d at 1289.  If a parent or guardian unilaterally removes a child from the local public school system, the parent or guardian may obtain reimbursement for an alternative placement only if able to demonstrate that the regular school placement was inappropriate, and that the alternative placement was appropriate. School Comm. of Burlington v. Department of Educ., 471 U.S. 359, 373-74, 105 S.Ct. 1996, 2004, 85 L.Ed.2d 385 (1985). If Todd’s IEP in the local public school district was appropriate, then there is no need to inquire further as to the appropriateness of The Oaks’ program.

          Under IDEA, an “appropriate” placement is that which enables a child to obtain “some benefit” from the public education he is receiving; not necessarily maximization of his potential. See Rowley, 458 U.S. at 198-200, 102 S.Ct. at 3047. In addition to requiring that the child’s placement be appropriate in the sense of providing some benefit, IDEA mandates that to the fullest extent possible, disabled children be educated with non-disabled children in the least restrictive environment. See 20 U.S.C. § 1412(5); Rowley, 458 U.S. at 202, 102 S.Ct. at 3048; Sherri A.D., 975 F.2d at 206 (“Even in cases in which mainstreaming is not a feasible alternative, there is a statutory preference for serving disabled individuals in the setting which is least restrictive of their liberty and which is near the community in which their families live”). A presumption exists in favor of the local public school district’s plan for educating the child, provided it comports with IDEA. See Tatro v. State of Texas, 703 F.2d 823, 830 (5th Cir.1983). See generally Rowley, 458 U.S. at 207-08, 102 S.Ct. at 3051.

          There is ample evidence that Todd received significant benefit from his public school placement. Todd’s teacher and school psychologist both testified that Todd made significant progress academically and behaviorally while in the TISD special education program. Not only did Todd advance in terms of grade level, he also became steadily more able to focus on particular tasks for longer periods without experiencing debilitating frustration. At the same time, the TISD special education program provided Todd with

some opportunity to interact with nondisabled peers, and the opportunity to participate in the affairs of the community in which he lived.

          Todd’s one-on-one instruction at TISD was no more restrictive than necessary to assure that he would receive some academic benefit from special education at TISD. The school psychologist testified that while she would have recommended some sort of residential placement had the district not been able to provide Todd with one-on-one

instruction, she would never consider placing a child like Todd at a residential facility as restrictive as The Oaks without first exhausting the full range of less restrictive alternatives. She testified that even though Todd had serious behavior problems, she did not consider him so unruly as to require twenty-four hour supervision in a locked unit. In the school psychologist’s opinion, The Oaks was a placement of last resort.

          By contrast to the unambiguous evidence that Todd benefitted from special education at the TISD school, the evidence that Todd benefitted from educational services at The Oaks is equivocal. The evidence Todd’s parents produced to support their claim that Todd benefitted academically from educational programming at The Oaks compares Todd’s performance before he received special education services at the TISD school with Todd’s performance after he was institutionalized. Hence, it is difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain whether the source of the benefit Todd obtained was provided primarily by the TISD school, or by The Oaks. It is uncontroverted that The Oaks’ focus was on behavior management, and that The Oaks devoted only the same or a little more time to Todd’s educational programming than did the TISD school.

        Finally, Todd’s placement at The Oaks involved more restrictions on Todd’s liberty than any other potential placement, removed Todd from his home community, and completely precluded him from having any contact with nondisabled peers. There is exceedingly little evidence, other than the hospital’s willingness to admit Todd, that he required such a restrictive environment. Although we can assume, based on Todd’s admission to The Oaks, that a physician

ratified Todd’s parents’ decision to hospitalize their son, the great weight of the evidence indicated that he could not only cope, but thrive, in a less restrictive setting.

Dicta

  The evidence indicates that Todd was receiving benefit from the TISD special education program, and hence, the TISD special education program was an appropriate placement under IDEA. Equally important, the TISD special education program provided

Todd with an opportunity to interact with nondisabled peers, and was a less restrictive environment than The Oaks. Thus, regardless of whether Todd extracted any academic benefit from the educational program at The Oaks, Todd’s parents’ unilateral decision to place him there remains their financial responsibility. For these reasons, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Implications

 

The district court carefully phrased its conclusion and, while it did not explicitly state that the educational program offered by the School District did not meet the “some educational benefit” standard of Rowley, the district court showed that it was aware of that decision and its judgment is therefore tantamount to such a conclusion. Hence, we hold that the district court applied the appropriate standard to the factual determinations supported by the record. The general injunctive relief granted by the court was appropriate to ensure that Steven receives the summer programming to which he is entitled under the Act.

Dr. William Allan Kritsonis Inducted into the William H. Parker Leadership Academy Hall of Honor (HBCU)

 

Remarks by Angela Stevens McNeil

July 26th 2008

 

Good Morning. My name is Angela Stevens McNeil and I have the privilege of introducing the next Hall of Honor Inductee, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis. Dr. Kritsonis was chosen because of his dedication to the educational advancement of Prairie View A&M University students. He earned a Bachelor’s degree in 1969 from Central Washington University in Ellensburg, Washington.  In 1971, he earned his Master’s in Education from Seattle Pacific University.  In 1976, he earned his PhD from the University of Iowa. 

Dr. Kritsonis has served and blessed the field of education as a teacher, principal, superintendent of schools, director of student teaching and field experiences, invited guest professor, author, consultant, editor-in-chief, and publisher.  He has also earned tenure as a professor at the highest academic rank at two major universities.

In 2005, Dr. Kritsonis was an Invited Visiting Lecturer at the Oxford Round Table at Oriel College in the University of Oxford, Oxford, England.  His lecture was entitled the Ways of Knowing through the Realms of Meaning.

In 2004, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis was recognized as the Central Washington University Alumni Association Distinguished Alumnus for the College of Education and Professional Studies. 

Dr. William Kritsonis is a well respected author of more than 500 articles in professional journals and several books.  In 1983, Dr. Kritsonis founded the NATIONAL FORUM JOURNALS. These publications represent a group of highly respected scholarly academic periodicals. In 2004, he established the DOCTORAL FORUM – National Journal for Publishing and Mentoring Doctoral Student Research. The DOCTORAL FORUM is the only refereed journal in America committed to publishing doctoral students while they are enrolled in course work in their doctoral programs. Over 300 articles have been published by doctorate and master’s degree students and most are indexed in ERIC.

Currently, Dr. Kritsonis is a Professor in the PhD Program in Educational Leadership here at Prairie View A&M University.

            Dr. William Kritsonis has dedicated himself to the advancement of educational leadership and to the education of students at all levels.  It is my honor to bring him to the stage at this time as a William H. Parker Leadership Academy Hall of Honor Inductee.

Landmark Education on Communication

Everyone at some point has experienced an impasse in communication; those frustrating occasions when it all breaks down and people want to get up and walk out. Just look at a sample of recent headlines: “Peace Talks Breakdown” or “Labor Negotiations at a Stalemate” or “Negotiations Fail to Result in an Accord”. When the stakes are high and people are afraid they have something to loose communication becomes strained and people stop listening to one another. Usually this is while claiming that the people on the other side of the table are actually the ones who are not doing the listening. We get so concerned and fearful about getting other people to hear what we have to say, we become unwilling to hear what they have to say.

Indeed, listening seems sometimes as if it is a rare happening among human beings. We can’t really listen to another person speaking if we’re preoccupied, or if we’re trying to decide what we’re going to say when the other stops talking, or if we’re debating about whether what is being spoken is true or relevant or agreeable. Listening, in other words, is being accessible and open to what is being said.

At Landmark Education we contend that listening has an amazing power. It gives life to what is being spoken. You might even say it is with the listener that both the speaker and what is spoken exist and come alive. Think of how inspired and enlivened the elderly can become when you sit down and have an extended conversation with them. Think about what happens when someone is really listening to you. Ever notice that you become funnier and more playful when someone laughs at your jokes? What about when a child recognizes that adults are actually listening to them? Their whole demeanor shifts. In the programs of Landmark Education, you find yourself with a new ability to listen to others. You find yourself inspired by the people you have in your life. When you truly listen to people you discover the best of what they have to offer.

Speaking, meanwhile, can be something more than talking, more than the exchange of symbols or information, more than saying what you really think. In speaking we can share ourselves; we can evoke experience in others. Speaking is where our ideas become clear and possible. It is where others are expanded by our time spent with them. It allows for the futures we create. Speaking lives in poetry, in the appreciation of another, in idle conversations that pass the time, in great theories and books that give rise to wonder and thought.

.

Speaking allows for “who” and “how” we “are” in the world. It is what gives voice to all that is possible in being human. In our ability to speak and share we have the ability to shape the world we live in.

In the courses of Landmark Education you find that true communication is creation. It has the power to shape, determine, and alter the course and quality of our lives. It moves people. It generates experience in others. It not only delivers information to others, it actually transforms their ability to hear. True communication transforms both the speaker and listener.

The Landmark Forum suggests that what it is to be human has its own domain and that domain is one of language—of communication, of conversation. Through communication —the realm of language, of conversation—each of us has complete access to ourselves, to others, to the very essence and possibility of what it means to be human.

This is the essence of what Landmark Education is about and what The Landmark Forum provides.

Copyright © 2007 Landmark Education. All rights reserved.

Top Educational Supplies for 2011

As we approach the end of the year, thoughts once again turn to fresh starts, new beginnings and making the most of the New Year.

The Classroom is an excellent environment to apply these thought processes; its great for opportunities to try new things, learn a new subject or simply to improve grades and really excel, making 2011 a top year for learning and improving.

To help equip for these New Year Academic goals, an excellent supplier of educational resources is essential. Having one which can provide the best range of great quality products that cover the entire curriculum for all age groups can be tricky to find at the best of times!

So it’s good to know that some suppliers have managed to achieve this by becoming fantastic one-stop-shops for everything you could possibly need to get ahead in 2011.

These top suppliers are well stocked and packed full of new and innovative educational resources which have been designed to not only aid learning, but to engage pupils, make learning fun & interesting and to ensure you get the most out of teaching in 2011.

If that’s not enough, some of these suppliers have gone the extra mile by having their educational resources tried and tested (and highly approved!) by industry experts and associations which really helps when making decisions. After all, investing in education is so important, it should be done with confidence and peace of mind. So the extra effort made by these educational suppliers really does pay off.

Another great feature of these educational one stop shops which is well worth mentioning is the exceptional quality and value across their entire range. The products are great value for money and thanks to their quality materials and design will stand the test of time, proving to be a lasting resource which cn be used well into the next new year too!

So why not set some Academic goals for 2011 and see what you can achieve or indeed, help others to achieve with the right tools and support from these top Educational Suppliers.